

Do you know the Eisenhower speech?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dwight_D._Eisenhower's_farewell_address


Do you know the Eisenhower speech?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dwight_D._Eisenhower's_farewell_address


retarded


Can we do top 1% so that I don’t feel included?


JD?


As if there would be no social networking without Zuckerberg.
Like any sin, the change starts with us. If we want a healthy social network, we can build a healthy social network.


Then article 42 of the EU


Or somebody else is doing the manipulation and is successfully putting the blame on Russia.
All foreign fruit being very scarce and people standing in long lines to get it, while the ones in the back knew they probably aren’t getting any today? Also westerners’ fault.
Do you know the history of the united fruit company? That one could be correct.
Cigarettes and other things of value will become cash again.


You may be right. Then please explain to me how history is needed for science.


Congratulations that you acknowledge that rising minimum wage is a dead end.


Jobs can always be created by lowering interest rates. It’s just not in the hand of the workers to change, neither is minimum wage.
You don’t have to trust anything I said. I am telling you about market mechanisms that you can verify on your own.
You are right that I want to abandon minimum wage, or rather the need for minimum wage. I want the demand for work to rise to the point that workers earn livable wages that are secured by the demand for their work.
You can try to rise minimum wages however much you want. My point is that your time is better spent on rising demand for workers. Marx is telling you how that works. You definitely don’t have to trust me on that.


You are not wrong that I should read a book on epistemology. But why do you ask me how science can create knowledge? If you have read those books yourself, you should know.


Would you pay for an insurance to help you weather the storm?


I don’t have that disregard. My point is that the supply of jobs has to be increased instead of setting a lower bound on wages.
Taking them as a whole, the general movements of wages are exclusively regulated by the expansion and contraction of the industrial reserve army
Focussing on minimum wages makes workers ignore how they are controlled and how they can increase their wages without having to rely on benevolence. To me, that’s disregardful.


As you noted, I rephrased your words. We are not talking about my axioms. It doesn’t make sense to define tainted if that is not what you mean.
Still, your point seems to be that definition of words require history. You can have that form of history. The context is just that history is rewritten and I argue that that can be compensated with science.


Enlighten me. Science can always be recreated. Which knowledge is needed from history that cannot be created in a scientific way?
Science was created for a time when knowledge was insecure because it was tainted with superstition.


Please read the article. It’s one of the most important things to know.


How does science know if something is true, with experiments.
It’s never the grandkids. The Beatles sold the rights to their songs.