Afaik they’re a discount brand? That you have to buy from Newegg? But I’m glad there is at least one option!

Lol they absolutely are subsidized. Look how expensive non-smart TVs are new

We say this now but in 5 years, cars could go the way of smart TVs… sold at prices subsidized by advertisers.

Yeah instead of an arms race it’s a weight race

Thanks for succinctly explaining what thunderbolt is

Skype was annoying to use and so is element

I believe it, I just wonder what edge case makes this possible?

Like is it people living on farms, or oil rigs?

I know that women can stand up from a wall squat without pushing off the wall first, are there other athletic pursuits that are more geared towards women’s abilities?

Also thanks for your in depth explanation, that makes a lot of sense why mostly men would practice for those disciplines.

Also they might steal from you, or just do a bad job maybe.

Instructions unclear, my engine and wheels are sitting on the lawn now, what should I do?

I upvoted your first comment but I wish I could downvote this one

Wait until it shows up in a Google AI result. Superket is playing the long game

In my car, I need to push the accelerator first, a little bit, then I can release the clutch to the bite point, all while giving the engine enough gas not to die.

HMD not allowing bootloader unlocks is indefensible

Could you explain more about the gymnastics thing? Because I’ve often wondered why women can’t compete in things like the parallel bars or the rings.

Like isn’t there anyone who wants to do it even if they wouldn’t be competitive with a man?

Exception that proves the rule? That’s pretty awesome though.

IDK, men already dominate so much of the world, why not make space for women’s sports.

But imo it should be more like the weight classes in wrestling and less like the binary mens/women’s thing with different rules.

Like why are men’s and women’s gymnastics so different. Why can’t the person do the event they want to compete in?

https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/business/tech/2024/09/05/how-safe-are-waymo-self-driving-cars-here-is-the-new-online-data/75061953007/?gnt-cfr=1&gca-cat=p

“Being better than human drivers” is such a low bar because human drivers are terrible. But even if AI cars do better statistically, the mistakes they do make are so strange and preventable, it really makes you think.

Just because something is safer statistically doesn’t mean it doesn’t need to be better. Heck maybe the whole system needs to be better.

You can argue for both automation and fair treatment for workers. For example, if gas lamps become electric, you could give the lamplighters some time or new training to find a new job. I’m sure a labor academic would know better how to navigate jobs being obsoleted, but the answer to technologic progress isn’t “keep taxi drivers at all costs” it’s “protect taxi drivers from corporations”

Correct!

It’s all about your intended use. If you want to use Google maps to get to work, the DoD has no problem with web Mercator on the maps backend that serves up your map tiles.

If you’re firing up Arcmap for a GIS project, using the map to navigate based on earth features, or making a reference map, of course the DoD or anyone else, wouldn’t want you to use web mercator