The butterfly effects would add up and and any zygote formed would not be the hitler-as-we-know anymore, since it would be a different combination of sperm and eggs.

Who needs guns when you got a time machine? Don’t like your highschool bully, just bump into their parents back in time. Or you know, “bump” ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) into their parents.

  • Siegfried@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 hours ago

    We have our own hitlers living now. I think we should care about them first before thinking on time traveling

      • hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Ehh, people are capable of doing pretty nasty shit regardless of sex or gender. But on the other hand, had Hitler not been a cis man, it’d have been a lot harder to get in a position of power that’d enable hitler to do what he did. So I see your point.

    • Burninator05@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 minute ago

      It wouldn’t be a paradox if Hitker’s dad wasn’t actual Hitler’s dad. It turns out you went back in time to make that deposit and give us the timeliness we know.

  • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    The butterfly effect refers to divergent chaotic systems. Chaos in math isn’t the layman’s chaos. It doesn’t mean wild. It only means there is no closed form mathematical solution. For example stepping on a butterfly can’t affect the weather such that the moon would crash into the Earth.

    Bumping into Hitler’s parents wouldn’t necessarily change anything. You have to do something drastic such that he was conceived days to weeks apart such that the sperm was completely different. Even a minor delay wouldn’t affect it because the sperm that fertilizes an egg isn’t random. There are selection hurdles in mobility that the sperm passes such that the most “fit” is likely the one that fertilizes the egg.

    • vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      No it doesn’t mean that. It means that tiny changes in input result in big changes in the output.

      By your definition, a simple ellipse is chaotic. Which it clearly isn’t. Tiny changes in the axes result in tiny changes to its shape, and by extension its perimeter. Yet there is no closed form formula for the perimiter of an ellipse.

      This could also be verified using a simple dictionary, not even a math textbook.

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        A tiny change could mean a big change but it doesn’t mean that change must be unlimited. For example a double pendulum is a classic chaotic system. There is no solution but that doesn’t mean the pendulum can move greater than the length of its segments. It’s still a bound system.

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaos_theory

        More importantly, in the real world, if you push a double pendulum, it won’t flail endlessly. It will eventually converge to the single state of rest.

    • LanguageIsCool@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Chaos means that a small change in initial conditions can lead to drastically different places in the long term, so I think OP was using the idea correctly. Though I agree that just bumping into the parents may not be enough to push the system into another trajectory.

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        56 minutes ago

        Chaos means that a small change in initial conditions can lead to drastically different places in the long term

        Yes, what I was trying to explain is that it could (no closed form) but doesn’t necessarily mean that is must. A chain with 2 segments is a double pendulum, the classic simple chaotic system. If you hold a piece of chain and give it a light tap, it will move chaotically for a few seconds and then come back to rest. The system will not have changed. Even with a hard push, the chain can’t move beyond the limit of the links.

        If you gave Hitler’s dad a push, he would stumble for a second (chaotically), then go back to walking (return to initial state). Nothing would change.

  • FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Let’s say you’re right and you’ve prevented the birth of Adolf or altered him to send him to another life trajectory. Who is to say that there wouldn’t be another mad person, naturally a man, who would rise to power and commit similar if not even worse crimes. It’s not only the person that made the fuehrer possible, it’s also everything happening in the world, especially politics at the time. So you’ve bumped Adolf but you’ve created Anton who was similarly radicalized but he wasn’t a landscape painter, he was a physics major and he made Germany develop nuclear weapons much faster. So now you have to go back and disturb Anton’s conception. Which brings about fuehrer Armin and so forth. You might be stuck in a time loop you’ll never be able to stop because you can’t control all the variables.

    • bizarroland@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      14 hours ago

      For real, there was nothing particularly special about Hitler that made him the one and only being of his type.

      It was a confluence of multiple differing things, the emergence of new media technologies, and the ability to repeat a single message over and over again to as many people as needed to hear them without any equally as loud voices of dissent.

      Combine that with an incredible financial depression and the consequences of an ill thought war being foisted upon your country’s shoulders.

      Admittedly, it was his own personal biases against the Jewish people that caused the Holocaust, and the Aktion T4 was similarly born out of his hatred of people with mental disabilities.

      In any case, if you take a miserable nation, give them a lightning rod to direct all of the misery of their own lives at, and an eloquent or charismatic leader to tell them it is okay to vent their frustrations on the helpless people that surround them, then you too can create another Hitler.

    • Without the Holocaust, there’d have been no international horror over the atrocities of concentration camps, gas chambers, human experimentation, genocide. Anti-Jewish sentiment was rampant around the world.

      Progressives made a lot of progress off the back of WWII, and the anti-fascist sentiment in the US that survived until the greatest generation died and their grandchildren took over. It’s entirely possible that, without WWII, the fascism we see in the US today would have happened much earlier, and we’d have run our own concentration camps.

      Ironically, the people who probably would have benefited most from preventing “Hitler” would be the modern Palestinians, because without Hitler, Israel would not exist today, and it wouldn’t be carrying out a genocide.

    • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Reminds me a bit of the setting for the Red Alert series of games. Although there they actually go back in time and kill Hitler so different from the scenario in this post but the possible alternate timelines are fun to think about.

  • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 hours ago

    B. F. Skinner would like a word

    For twenty-five hundred years people have been preoccupied with feelings and mental life, but only recently has any interest been shown in a more precise analysis of the role of the environment. Ignorance of that role led in the first place to mental fictions, and it has been perpetuated by the explanatory practices to which they gave rise.

  • .Donuts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Don’t like your highschool bully, just bump into their parents back in time. Or you know, “bump” ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) into their parents

    Forcing your high school bully to call you daddy is one hell of a power move

  • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    15 hours ago

    on a side note…

    Important Note: In order to marry, Alois and Klara had to obtain a dispensation from the Church due to their close familial ties. This highlights the fact that they were indeed related and their marriage was considered unusual for the time.

  • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    If the same geopolitical environment still led to World War II but with a different German leader then the outcome of the war could very well have ended differently.

    Leading up to major invasions like D-Day in Normandy and the invasion of Sicily the allies implemented major deceptions to confuse the Germans. Despite some senior leadership recognizing at least some aspects of those deceptions, Hitler himself fell for them pretty thoroughly and ordered troop movements that reduced German defenses where the attacks took place, and delayed moving them back because he still believed the deceptions were real. There are other examples of poor decisions by Hitler throughout the course of the war that proved helpful for the allies as well.

    If Germany had a more qualified military leader running things then events like the Normandy D-Day invasion could have had a very different outcome. If the Germans had the Normandy beaches better defended then that invasion could very well have failed. And if that happened then there’s a good chance Germany could have won the war.

  • Bizzle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I read a short story… I don’t remember the name of it… Anyway the guy goes back in time and kills Hitler, only to discover upon his return that everything was worse. So he went back and stopped himself.

    • A1kmmA
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Possibly “Making History” by Stephen Fry - although at 380 pages it doesn’t quite match as a short story, and the protagonist doesn’t stop himself so much as do something else to reverse the effects of his actions to save Hitler.

  • unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    yeah. you, your parents, your grandparents, all your people, GONE. never happened. different versions of same still happen, possibly even happy and flourishing. love that for them. Also Hitler still happened, under a different name.