lemmy.amxl.com
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Hofmaimaier@feddit.org to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 days ago

will document for sex

feddit.org

message-square
26
fedilink
269

will document for sex

feddit.org

Hofmaimaier@feddit.org to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 2 days ago
message-square
26
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • Rose@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 days ago

    “Documentation is like sex: You’re not getting any”

    • FireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.fr
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Damn haha, this made me laugh out loud

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    2 days ago

    Someone’s never read instructions autotranslated from Chinese and not checked for accuracy.

    • kubica@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Well, sometimes I ask questions to the AI and makes the same sense.

    • stochastictrebuchet@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Literally me yesterday trying to decipher Baidu’s PaddleOCR docs. Have half a mind to aim Claude Code at the URL and just be like ‘plz help’

  • thatradomguy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    Respectfully disagree. Sometimes the documentation is so bad that you have more questions than answers and even then, what they provide still doesn’t really explain how to do something with enough details. It’s all literally shot in the dark and you’re just left with leap of faith. * cough * Sonicwall * cough *

  • Console_Modder@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 days ago

    Absolutely not. I’d rather have no documentation and start from scratch than be gaslit by an entire team of people telling me that the very obviously wrong documentation is correct and has been correct for 30 years

    • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think there’s a difference between bad and wrong. Wrong documentation is incorrect. Bad documentation isn’t really incorrect, it’s just poorly executedb and mostly unhelpful.

  • magic_lobster_party@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 days ago

    Then you haven’t seen bad documentation (or had that sex you regret).

    • FireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.fr
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      In general it’s supposed to be something good so it shouldn’t be harmful, but ofc exceptions exist, especially with sex, sadly…

      Bad often equals “not super good” in this context

  • 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    no.

  • Owl@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    Bad documentation could land you in prison.

    Bad sex is just horrible all around.

    not sure what this post is on about

  • Godnroc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    2 days ago

    When it’s bad you think “Fuck this, I can do it better by myself.”

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Bad sex is not better than no sex… Wtf… :)

  • spooky2092@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’ve had to use outdated documentation that made the problem worse. So I guess bad documentation is like bad, unprotected sex with a lot lizard that leaves you with an itching or burning sensation.

  • gerryflap@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    As an asexual person this anology is very confusing

    • ColdSideOfYourPillow@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      As a sexual person, I agree

  • einlander@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Documentation: use x function Reality: x function depreciated

  • JamesBoeing737MAX@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    What about rape? Is that just chatgpt reworded documentation?

  • /home/pineapplelover@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    There’s this cool program called qalc. I stumble on to cool features in it that’s not even listed in the documentation.

  • And009@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Don’t be virgins, document things

Programmer Humor@programming.dev

programmer_humor@programming.dev

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !programmer_humor@programming.dev

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

  • Keep content in english
  • No advertisements
  • Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1.68K users / day
  • 5.67K users / week
  • 9.81K users / month
  • 18.2K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 23.8K subscribers
  • 809 Posts
  • 16.3K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • adr1an@programming.dev
  • Feyter@programming.dev
  • BurningTurtle@programming.dev
  • Pierre-Yves Lapersonne@programming.dev
  • BE: 0.19.9
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org