• grrgyle@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s larger than 1, which is the number of people of people the article is holding up as some kind of Cassandra.

    • ctrl_alt_esc@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Well the sample size is probably sufficient, there’s obviously a bias toward woke folk though.

      • blarghly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        That’s the problem. You’re hanging out with too many “MuH vIoLEnT RevOlUtiOn!!!” types. If you want the system to fail, of course you’re going to see every reason why it would fail.

        • ctrl_alt_esc@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 days ago

          What? That’s not what woke means. Aside from that, every sane person would want a system with Turd at the helm to fail.

        • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Hey actively hates ML here, for once the bastards ain’t wrong. Even my largely offline friends can practically feel it, we’re hoping for a Soviet or Yugoslavia style break up since us being on the West Coast would keep us a good bit from the immediate blast radius. The Great Basin, Sonora, and Mojave are great buffer regions.