• BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    7 days ago

    Yeah, I guess we should just keep electing the same corrupt losers who promise nothing, and do less.

    Zohran is offering real changes, when everybody else seems to be perfectly comfortable with business as usual in MAGA Nazi America. Maybe they’ll work, maybe they won’t, and more likely it will be a mix of the two, but at least he wants to try something different than the usual losing strategies.

    • iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      7 days ago

      Trump offered real change. That wasn’t a good thing. Turns out, your changes need to be good

      • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        6 days ago

        And that’s why Mamdani won, he wasn’t promising vague platitudes. He was promising very specific actions that are entirely within the power of the mayor’s office to enact. A lot of his agenda will simply be signing legislation passed by the City Council that Mayor Adams vetoed. He convinced people to vote for him because he not only had a ideas, but a very specific and tangible plan on how to achieve them. And Mamdani’s changes are good.

          • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            What made you come to that conclusion? That’s a perfectly fair minimum wage for a place as expensive as NYC. And it could be passed by the city council and signed by the mayor. Adams just vetoed a bill trying to raise the app worker minimum wage to $22/hour or so. $30 is only 1/3 more than this, and Mamdani proposed implementing it over several years. I think you may just be suffering from jealousy, and ignoring that this is in the context of NYC, where $60k/year is not a lot of money.

            • iopq@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              Because it would never happen. Only one third more?

              Listen, if you “only” got one third more money next paycheck you’d be pretty stoked

              • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                5 days ago

                A third increase is the kind of increase to the minimum wage that has happened countless times. It happens in any place that the minimum wage isn’t indexed to inflation. It isn’t until there’s been a substantial degradation in the earning power of minimum wage earners that there’s enough political pressure to have a hope of actually getting a minimum wage increase through. The business lobby will always resist any increase. And minimum wage earners don’t really have a lot of political capital.