• shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Why organize a labor union to keep the tyrants from paying you poverty wages when you could just submit the name of the tyrant to the assassination market and let somebody take care of it?

    The more unpopular you are as a human being, the shorter your expected lifespan, because the reward for you not existing would increase proportionally to how much of an asshole you were.

    The next person knowing that the workers are why the last person was deposed would be a hell of a lot less likely to pay poverty wages and become unpopular since they have an incentive to live.

    Personally, I’ve never followed or paid very much attention to politics as I see it as a pointless endeavor. The way our political systems are set up these days, they will get what they want and fuck what the people think.

    I think there are a group of people that go into politics who are just pure evil and do so in order to have control over other people. I think there are some people who go into politics actually thinking they can change the system and have absolutely no idea that they don’t matter in the grand scheme of things.

    Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts, absolutely.

    • Five@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Why organize a labor union to keep the tyrants from paying you poverty wages when you could just submit the name of the tyrant to the assassination market and let somebody take care of it?

      The more unpopular you are as a human being, the shorter your expected lifespan, because the reward for you not existing would increase proportionally to how much of an asshole you were.

      What are some ways that you can think of where a scheme like this could have undesirable results?

      • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think scale is the problem.

        With something like national politics, for example, the politicians can be thousands of miles away from you and really have no accountability to you as an individual.

        In state politics, the politicians may be a hundred miles away or so, but that’s at least a doable trip, and you are able to make your voice heard better than you would if the politicians were a thousand miles away, because you can actually make that trip.

        The mayor of your city and your city hall are probably only going to be about 20 or 30 miles away at the absolute maximum and you can very easily get to that local meeting point and make your voice heard on issues that affect you.

        I’ve had the idea for a while that something like the United States is just too big to effectively work. Also, the smaller a country is, the less war making power it tends to have, so somewhere like the United States or Russia could wipe out the entire human population of the planet, whereas a place like Ethiopia could affect a war locally but would not be able to affect a war across the world.

        • Five@slrpnk.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          How big would a country need to be before it is too big, and what mechanism or entity would effectively enforce it from reaching or exceeding that size?