Vladimir Putin has said any western troops placed in Ukraine would be “legitimate targets” for Russian strikes, upping the stakes as Kyiv’s allies scramble to come up with a convincing offer of postwar support to Ukraine.

Speaking a day after the French president, Emmanuel Macron, announced still-vague plans for a package of support for Ukraine backed by 26 nations, Putin on Friday said any guarantees that involved boots on the ground would violate Moscow’s longstanding objections to Nato troops in Ukraine.

Add: See for more context this other news post

  • Skiluros@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    What does this have to do with russian imperialism?

    Was the russian economy running off of war in the 90s too?

    Does Smedly Buttlers speak russian? I am genuinely curious.

    • n3m37h@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Read the damn speech

      1990 ≠ 2025

      It doesnt matter, he explains why war is a racket with in depth personal knowledge of why it is.

      Putin is a power hungry goblin, in this world money is power. If ya don’t understand that then you shouldnt be replying

      • Skiluros@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        No, chances are I have more in-depth personal knowledge of war than that fellow (don’t forget, the russians invaded in 2014).

        To claim that all of war is based on cold war era “military industrial complex” polemics is ahistorical and doesn’t align with reality.

        If that speech is as relevant as you claim, you should have no problems with explaining in 3-5 sentences how it is relevant in the context of this discussion.

        • n3m37h@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Well no point in going any further wirh this convo, you think you know more about war and what a military complex is than a general who had served in multiple wars, all while you dont know what a military industrial complex is. You have 0 interest in learning what it is. Also Smedley wrote the speech in 1934 before there was WWII, yet alone cold war. And the military industrial complex was alive then too.

          If that speech is as relevant as you claim, you should have no problems with explaining in 3-5 sentences how it is relevant in the context of this discussion.

          No, it can not be summed up in 3-5 sentences, thag ia why he wrote the fucking speech, read the damn speech, ya wasted more time writing this than it would have taken to read the fucking thing.