Saw this in my adguard home query logs.

  • Zerush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    54 minutes ago

    I use Vivaldi, it’s IMHO the only decent Chromium browser, apart European, with a good privacy, no logs, no tracking no third party investors. great services and community.

  • NinjaTurtle@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    Don’t a lot of browsers by default have pings set up to track usage? Check the privacy section. There is usually a check box about sending daily pings to whatever company made the browser to track usage.

    Not sure about the variations though

  • BCBoy911@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    Just use Firefox for gods sakes, Brave is a complete joke of a browser especially when it comes to privacy.

    • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Yeah, doing any kind of digging into Brave will immediately send up warning flares that the privacy claims are pure fluff. Just use Firefox or Librewolf.

  • pound_heap@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Depends on what you mean by “private”. I would not trust it much, but it’s not a bad Chromium based browser when you need one. Use something like LibreWolf for much more privacy out of the box.

    • monovergent@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      For the best privacy when you do need a Chromium-based browser, the ungoogled-chromium flatpak is an excellent choice.

  • irotsoma@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    9 hours ago

    No. At least not in the way most people expect.

    It does block some tracking and ads that Chrome alone allows or explicitly adds. But it simply shifts that tracking to Brave. The idea was that you’d still get the benefits of that tracking by giving all of your data to Brave instead. I honestly never was convinced by this considering your data is still being sold, just by a different company so it doesn’t sound much better to me. Supposedly, according to them, Brave is more trustworthy and gives you more control over what they track and sell, but I don’t trust that business model. There’s no real incentive for them to do what they said they would.

      • BCBoy911@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        It gets pushed often by reactionaries as an “anti-woke” browser LOL its a complete piece of shit. It’s got crypto, tracking, NFTs, AI and ads baked in. Literally everything I hate about the tech industry rolled up into one package. I’d rather use Chrome, even.

  • The Velour Fog @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    89
    ·
    11 hours ago

    That’s the lie they try to sell you.

    I swear Brave ran a very successful guerrilla marketing campaign and it succeeded on Reddit. If you so much as question it or suggest an alternative, you get dogpiled on by Brave bros. I don’t trust it one bit. I’ll stick to FF and its forks.

    • barnaclebutt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Yeah, haven’t they done a ton of shady shit? I always cringe when people recommend the Brave browser. It’s like recommending a free VPN.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Brave is a protection racket wrapped in a cryptocurrency scam, created by a bigoted fuckwit. It is fractally shit.

    • Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Apparently Brave’s got some cryptocurrency components, so I guess that’s where the cult-like following is.

  • artyom@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 hours ago

    You can disable this in the settings. Nobara ships with Brave now but with all of the telemetry and crypto BS turned off out of the box.

    • dajoho@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It’s a shame this is necessary, to be honest. It’s the same argument with Windows users: “you can just run a debloater and fiddle with the registry to disable tracking”. It shouldn’t be needed in the first place.

  • 0xtero@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Brave (the company) has a long history of doing dodgy stuff. They are just trying to do what Google did (directing clicks to their own shit), but they’re using privacy as their marketing spiel.

  • goatmeal@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Idk what the first two are, but you should be able to disable the usage ping at the bottom of privacy settings

  • Leaflet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    14 hours ago

    It’s more private but doesn’t have 0 telemetry. You can disable some telemetry in settings. But it still has to make requests for update checks if using Windows or MacOS.

    • BaroqueInMind@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I’m a grown adult and can check for updates my own damn self. This phone-home telemetry in the guise of updating bullshit needs to stop

      • Leaflet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Then as a grown adult, you can make your chrome policy.json to disable the automatic updates.

        And being an adult has nothing to do with it. If left to their own devices, most people will simply not update. Some people actively resist updates. Linux Mint had some statistics that showed that like half of their users were running severely out of date versions, so they had to change things.