Multiple Department of Justice employees "may have violated" Luigi Mangione's right to a fair trial through public comments and social media posts, a federal judge ruled on Wednesday -- and it could end up swaying the judge to grant a defense motion to take the death penalty off the table.
Hmm, not so sure about the innocence, imho. Also the photos I saw look very much like him. But I am a layman and open for arguments.
I am however curious about the eyebrows-argument. Is there maybe a video or blog, where someone with a background of crime investigation analyzes the provided screen caps and other evidence?
Edit: imagine downvoting an opinion you don’t like, instead of actually answering the question and helping understand the situation. This is not even a debate lmao
The photos from the crime scene do not match his photos, the youth hostel is another story that looks like him, the photo of the guy with the surgical mask on the street where it happened, not the same guy. You can shave off unibrows, you cannot grow one in a week. Plus other facial features do not match.
Who ever said anything about a debate?
Here is my argument. He only looks similar. They “found” a gun when searching the backpack way later out of eyewitnesses. Why would he have a manifest and such with him in an entirely different state after leaving a crime scene. But I’m also just a layman and could be wrong.
Or he’s the guy, but they had no (legal) way to tie him to it and therefore planted the evidence.
Has he made any sort of public statement about it?
Well, humans can act weird, especially under heavy stress. You usually don’t just kill someone for the very first time and shrug it off. However, I do actually not know when and where they found the evidence. If the manifest was handwritten, then it is quite easy to find out if he wrote it.
The usual stress action in these sort of cases is to dump evidence immediately. In fact, the actual hero kind of did that by leaving a backpack in the nearby park.
Guys I think we
findfound the real killer! Everyone be on the lookout for zr0 getting his eyebrows waxed or altered to mask his true appearance!I did not come up with the argument and I have actually no clue how important eyebrows are in a criminal case
I think he was innocent because it was clearly self defense.
Yeah I think we all are on the same page about what monster the CEO was
There is reasonable doubt based on what has been provided to the public. But I am sure there is a lot more evidence to be shown at trial.
You say reasonable doubt. Who is saying this?
Me. No one of importance is, because the trial hasn’t started yet.