• ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    3 days ago

    To do it again would literally kill air travel in the country for the next 30 years. People would literally stop flying.

    From a climate perspective, that would be fantastic.

    • Taldan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Given everything you know about America, do you really think it would be fantastic for the climate?

      Because personally, I’m pretty sure people would just end up driving instead of flying, which is generally worse for the environment. Rich people would still be flying in private jets. We’d just see less commercial flights (and nearly zero general aviation), which would largely be replaced by people taking long road trips

      • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        If it were replaced with massive investment into public transport and new dedicated high speed rail between US cities, it’d be a huge net positive.

        A man can dream, anyway.

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        It may still have a net positive on emissions if only barely, a flight to Disneyworld gets canceled and not replaced is generally good, same thing with non essential conferences and conventions. But it could also respin up road trip culture, IE packing into and going to Carlsbad Caverns instead of flying out to the Florida.