• sunbeam60@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Because Denmark holds the rotating EU presidency, Denmark is literally required by treaty to work towards compromise when the council cannot agree. If it wasn’t Denmark doing this work, it would be another country holding the EU presidency doing it.

      It’s not really about Denmark - it’s about the entire council agreeing with a compromise the presidency has to seek.

      • verdi@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        It was voted out, that’s it. Nobody forced the danes to re-introduce the matter, especially when it was done with subterfuge.

        • sunbeam60@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          That’s wrong.

          Article 4(3) TEU requires that the country holding the rotating presidency of the council must act in the spirit of sincere cooperation, which means it must act as an “honest broker” and not pursue national interests. This means it must seek to find a compromise if the council cannot agree, which Denmark has done.

          Look, I’m not a fan of chat control. But the blame doesn’t lie with the Danes, it’s the whole of the EU one must blame.

    • possumparty@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      because when you have fourteen parties there’s bound to be at least a few fascists hiding behind the curtains. the real problem is that there’s not legislation that prevents this dude from retracting and resubmitting it when it looks like it’s gonna fail