• blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    If AI is modeled after intellectuals, there will inevitably be a swath of non-intellectuals who conclude the post title… because the idea of intellectuals predating AI is unthinkable to them.

  • Allero@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    The worst part - through human communication, texts on the internet, etc. - it seems to propagate towards people who don’t even use AI.

    I myself have strong aversion to it, but found myself using much more bullet points, cliché constructions, and yes - even em-dashes - when I don’t actively pay attention to how I write.

    I’ve always been sensitive to language around me, naturally adapting to the environment around - and now it backfires.

  • 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I knew this was a clickbait when it’s gizmodo, but oof

    The mods in the Wired story explain how they detect AI content, and unfortunately their methods boil down to “It’s vibes.”

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Hey man, if the vibes aren’t right, it’s probably AI. Uncanny Valley and shit, bruh. Seems legit.

  • hedge_lord@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    What logically follows is that I need to be as weird and eccentric as possible in order to counteract the memetic contagion of a lovecraftian averaging machine. I bet I could make a cult out of this!

    • Robaque@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It’s a catch-22 - try to be more unique, in an effort not to lose your humanity, but in doing so keep feeding the machine which subsists on creativity. A human-AI ouroboros.

  • Gsus4@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Hahaha, now even the source of new data is starting to be poisoned by LLMs…good luck trying to outproduce LLM slop to train LLMs…and ending up with goop real fast.

    • vithigar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I’m one of those deranged few who actually used em dashes in my normal typing habits. Not super often the way LLMs are prone to, maybe once a month tops. Alt+0151 or Compose, dash, dash, dash.

      Now a find myself reluctant to use what I felt was a useful bit of punctuation out of concern people might think what I’m typing was LLM generated. It sucks.

      • cecilkorik@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        I always just used – instead, because I’m too lazy to remember weird codes and I don’t know what a compose key is, but the intent is the same.

        Edit: oh and I forgot lemmy does weird stuff with em-dash too, what I originally wrote there was hyphen-hyphen

    • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 hours ago

      I always liked the dramatic…

      …pause.

      I’ve never used em-dashes to represent them. Am I doing it wrong?

    • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      People have been speaking with punctuation since language was invented. If you only now realize that pause is an em-dash, that’s on your schooling. :-p

  • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    13 hours ago

    If you read the actual article there’s barely any evidence that any of what they are claiming is even remotely true. They talk about vague connections through certain words being used on YouTube that are, in their own words, inconclusive. And a bunch of anecdotal instances on reddit in which mods use “vibes” to detect AI slop comments and posts. And then finish with more anecdotes about some real world encounters that they think are written by AI.

    I mean, no doubt that AI garbage is filtering into online discourse because let’s face it, people are lazy assholes who want easy karma and updoots. But this is hardly evidence that actual conversational language is being altered by AI.

  • medem@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Depressing, but not surprising. Even before the AS hype, I had long noticed that many people I regularly talk to (including a member of my immediate family who has been a teacher for decades) make horrendous spelling and grammar mistakes that they wouldn’t make if they picked up at least one book, at least once every few months. So: people were already forgetting how to write, spell, and even read coherently way before chatbots.