• Paragone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Banning it at-home, is 1 thing, but banning it while abroad & in hostile-regimes, would be idiocy: at the home-end, record the whole interaction, & make that part of official-record.

    But make it impossible for the hostile-regime to get anything from either the in-their-country device, or the encrypted stream which they can’t crack.


    the fact that corruption wants nonaccountability is 1 valid concern.

    but the fact that hostile-regimes exist, & we’re in economic-meshing with them, means that we need to be able to have officials in those countries.

    Which makes the requirement for communications which the hostile-regime can’t crack real.

    Oversimplificaiton is incompetent “management”.

    Don’t solve the wrong problem, & pretend that you aren’t responsible for the authority you mis-wielded.

    That they were having a non-accountable-within-the-EU group on Signal, that IS AN ACTUAL PROBLEM, but there are use-cases for Signal to be needed, if done properly.

    _ /\ _