• mozz@mbin.grits.devOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    What are you talking about, I don’t see any tick. Are you talking about the big text that says “NONCONSENSUAL BLUE TICK”?

    Maybe I am missing something but it kinda looks like Lemmy is engaging once again in a favorite activity, finding reasons why someone is “problematic” whether true or not, because that’s more fun than just engaging in reasonable posting and commenting and letting people be worth listening to sometimes

      • mozz@mbin.grits.devOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 months ago

        It’s honestly very perplexing to me

        Like why did 5 people upvote just pure combative nonsense. What did they see in it that led them to say “yeah this resonates with me, fuck this guy for objectively false reasons! I support this message!”

        It’s just confusing

        • The Doctor@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          I think it’s because people are taking their frustrations out on whatever seems to make people think something might be on the upswing. Even better, because you can’t necessarily see who upvoted nobody can call them on it.

          It’s like the folks who go to see a movie and gush about how awesome it was when you’re sitting around shooting the shit, but the moment they get on the Net they trash it in as many ways as possible.

          • mozz@mbin.grits.devOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            More or less agreed. Side note though, votes on Lemmy aren’t private. Admins or self-hosters can always see them if they care, and other platforms (notably Friendica and kbin/mbin depending on version and config) display the identities of people voting to everyone. It seems wrong to me that most Lemmy-style platforms don’t make this clear.