edit: this is now closed future comments won’t be counted

I keep seeing this instance is overrun with tankies so hey, lets do an informal survey like I’ve seen on hexbear

respond with YES or NO in the first line of your comment and i’ll tally everything in a couple of days, lets say I’ll try and collect everything on the sunday the 9th (10+gmt sorry)

not sure thisll work, be nice, have fun

  • WittyProfileName2 [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    NO

    Tankie has been shifting way beyond its original meaning to just be a vague leftward stab, but being an anarchist and everything I don’t think it applies to me just yet

    • TheFriar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      It doesn’t. But just like “fascist” has been used as an insult and scaremongering tactic since the late 40s, “tankie” has been used indiscriminately in recent years against anyone people disagree with. But I, like you, am an anarchist, and initially I would only see it in anarchist circles when communists came calling. Because that’s where the insult originated, if I’m not mistaken? Anarchists calling communists statist-leftists, to the point that they’re willing to lie for and defend their preferred states (those that use the communist name without actually being communist. Read: current day russia, china, and yes, even North Korea)

      • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Nobody calls Russia Communist, and nobody believes China is economically fully Socialist, but has a mixed economy.

        • TheFriar@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          Ever talked to a tankie?

          I’m not saying they’re communist. I’m saying that western e-communists confuse the concept of fighting “western propaganda” with defending everything that runs contrary to it. That means the Russia fearmongering that goes on in a lot of US-based circles must be countered with full throated defense of everything Russia has ever done. Especially under the Soviet Union.

          Atrocities under Stalin? western propaganda!

          That type of stuff.

          • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            I’ve spoken to a lot of people on Grad and Hexbear, and on .ml as well.

            I haven’t found many, if any, people confusing fighting western propaganda with defending anything that runs contrary to it. I have seen a lot more expression of nuanced views of the USSR than “100 million dead” memes, sure.

            Have you tried properly engaging with these people in good-faith? They more often than not have genuine reasoning behind their beliefs, which helps explain some takes, that isn’t just blind support for opponents of western hedgemony.

            • TheFriar@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              I have. Unless people come at me swinging, I prefer good, honest, non hostile conversations. But look:

              https://feddit.nl/post/16246531

              This post mentions exactly what I’m talking about. Being critical of Russia and China—modern day Russia and China, neither of which are communist—is met with pretty swift anger from tankies. I’m not crazy in having had this experience

              • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                People on Hexbear, .ml, and Lemmygrad are regularly critical of Russia and China. They critically support them in their efforts against Imperialism along Lenin’s definitions, which is basically Hyper-Capitalism, because they believe countries under the thumb of Imperialism cannot become Socialist, and Imperialist countries will not become Socialist until after they lose the countries they extract from.