• quindraco@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    How bad are these that Hexbear didn’t even make the list? Drilling through on the clickable version here makes it clear that the #1, poa.st, has the same basic content as Hexbear, but I’m assuming it’s somehow way worse. Just imagine.

    • GarfGirl#2@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      they’re neo nazi pedophiles iirc and in the brief time i was on a fedi instance federated with them i saw one of them trying to goad a trans person i knew with suicidal tendencies to kill herself because he thought it would be funny. like its so many orders of magnitude worst its just completely stupid to compare them at all. Like here’s some of the defed reasons from the top of the incredibly long list of instances that have defedded it:

      Nazi content
      Racism
      antisemitism, racism, homophobia
      Nationalsozialistisches Gedankengut
      Hate speech
      racist slurs, anti-semitic stuff, etc
      Nazisme, Transphobie, Racisme, Antisemitisme
      Admins are having Nazi symbolics in their profile
      racism, pedophilia, harassment
      Serveur d’extrême droite / Néonazi
      Repeated harassment targetting specific users
      Transphobia, Hate Speech, Nazi Symbology. Lack of Moderation.
      Homophobia, transphobia
      Hosting neonazis
      transphobia / homophobia / racism / queerphobia / nazi combo instance

    • Cyrus Draegur@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      hexbear isn’t even malicious. hexbear is spicy at best. not nearly as bad as lemmygrad, which is outright repugnant in its overt hostility. hexbear users are at least CAPABLE of communicating, whereas in my experience lemmygrad users pull the animal farm squealer move and defecate on the floor before storming out.

        • Sootius@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          How did Hexbear ever harass everyone here? Lemmy.world never even federated with them for a second.

          • Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            You’re misunderstanding what I mean. .world’s advent marked a paradigm shift where .ml was no longer the “default” lemmy instance. So long as hexbear was federated with the “default” lemmy instance, they were able to inflict their insanity on everyone else. Now .world provides a large part of lemmy insulation against them.

      • chemicalprophet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’m on hexbear. It’s a good community. It’s leftist though so conservatives and libruls won’t like it. But you can have a good argument and find like minded people.

        • 𝓔𝓶𝓶𝓲𝓮@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          It’s the kind of place you go when you are bored out of your mind, online and want to see some circus shit going on without being sprinkled in toxic dung

          It’s horrible but stomachable and you get to see very special people you didn’t know exist. A living cautionary tale of going too far

          • chemicalprophet@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            I don’t have that experience at all. But I’m not there to try and win any battles. Lots of true allies.

            • 𝓔𝓶𝓶𝓲𝓮@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              I mean they are literally Mao Zedong figures with rainbow clothes it’s fucking bizzare. I never expected to see gay Chinese communists and queer soviets hence for me it’s like a trip

              I only had similar feeling when seeing dark skinned Polish aryans neonazis, the clash of history is just too funny or at least it would be if it was a stand up comedy and they didn’t want to kill me on sight, just like the hexbears for that matter

              In any case as long as you pretend to be one of em it’s always super nice, cult like, sisterhood but they have cute tendency for wanting to kill you immediately after you reveal yourself

        • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          The thing is, you can ONLY have a conversation with extremely like minded people. If you are not tip-of-the-left authoritarian, you are called a filthy lib and shunned.

          Sadly it just suffers the same syndrome as that conservative sub on reddit: “Anyone who doesn’t agree with me on every important and semi important point is literally the same as my worst enemy and I will fill their inbox with insults”

          I disagreed with the way they often brigade posts and they said I was “indiscernible from the racist, fascist party” from my country. Like they went through the effort of looking up where I was from and the political parties there to find the most right wing one to name call and insult me with lol. That says a lot about the community culture, in my opinion.

          It also has heavy Russian apologist content. Like, I even understand that MLs love China and excuse everything they do, but Russia is literally an right wing oligarchy with no health care and crippled social benefits that is led by an extreme right wing authoritarian fascist. I get that they are China’s ally by the enemy-of-my-enemy principle, but that doesn’t mean they are automatically good.

        • ErinCrush@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Hexbear rules. 40 year old liberal tech nerds who grew up on American propaganda hate it because they hate change and congregations of young people.

          • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            I don’t hate change, I hate Putin apologism from a space that claims to be left wing.

            More to the point I hate brain dead takes like “voting is not harm reduction and if you don’t go 3rd party in 2024 you’re no better than a fascist”

    • PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      If you want to see far-right content and spam, join a far-right server or run your own, rather than trying to shame server owners into doing what you want.

      Admins are entitled to decide what they platform and what they don’t. On top of that, the user experience of “just block 100 servers of Nazis and incels to get to the content you want to see” is complete dogshit.

      This “it should all be user level” is just apologist bullshit.

      • Sootius@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Did anybody say admins aren’t entitled to block stuff? User just wanted a system to see everything and block what they didn’t want.

        Fuck off with this aggressive bad-faith shit.

    • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Because in order to block content, the user first has to see it. If I were an instance admin, I wouldn’t force my users to see any amount of N words and homophobic slurs, not even the once it takes to block it.

        • MindTraveller@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          With a blocklist, the user is putting their trust in an unnamed group of people with essentially no accountability. With defederation, the user puts their trust in admins they can talk to, with a public modlog to explain every decision. You’re proposing to take the same amount of control away from users, but with less accountability.

          • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            You can have the federated blocklist people named, decisions for adding to list public and explained. That way it would be the same as with admins

            • pmk@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              The difference, and the best part of the fediverse imho, is that if you’re not happy with someone elses rules you can become your own admin and set your own rules. The more we centralize power the further we go against that idea.

    • MBM@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      At least on Lemmy, defederating is also a way of banning all the instance’s users from your communities. If you’re constantly banning one instance’s users and their admins seem fine with it, there’s really no other way.

      • barsquid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I wish I, an individual account, could defederate from instances, like some way to block all those instances’ users.

        • Omniraptor@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          the lemmy devs added per user instance blocks a while ago. Check your settings page

          • jqubed@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            I’m pretty sure it doesn’t block the users; I blocked the NSFW Lemmy, whatever the big one is, because of how much porn would be on the All feed otherwise. I was surprised to see a post or comment from someone whose account was on that instance a few weeks ago, but it wasn’t anything I didn’t want to see so overall I was glad the users are still able to participate elsewhere if that’s what they want.

            • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Sort of. It does block the users, but only on your specific instance. If you’re interacting with a post on another instance and that instance is federated with them, you’ll still see them on that third instance.

              Defederating basically takes the three instances from a closed triangle ◺ (where all users can see and post on all three instances) to an open triangle ∟ (where your instance and the defederated instance are blocked from each other, but the third instance can still see and interact with both.)

  • quindraco@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    Yeah? Can you provide even 1 example of someone on Hexbear posting something a) civil and b) not fascist?

        • Flax@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Why? It’s just fearmongering and would damage the fediverse

            • Flax@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              The difference is nobody used XMPP before and after Google integrated it. People are using the fediverse. I don’t think people already using the fediverse will ever migrate to threads. If anything, people may realise that they can talk to threads people and leave Meta’s system. Even the BBC and the European Union have their own instances. I cannot see them migrating to Threads whenever Meta messing with politics is a known issue

              • whoareu@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                Has Threads already implemented activityPub or is it work in progress?

                • Flax@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  WIP. You can see threads posts from other instances but threads cannot see other instances IIRC

  • mister_monster@monero.town
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    #2 represent! Getting defederated is street cred. If crybabies don’t like you you’re doing something right.

    I don’t mess with fedi anymore though, besides dicking around on here. Socially I’m all about Nostr now, it’s the future of the non corpo social media, federated network architecture is simply too prone to abuse.

      • mister_monster@monero.town
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        That’s actually nor possible because there’s no global feed. Your network is what you make of it. I’m not a fan of voat types so I don’t interact with them online all that often.

        It’s interesting, the people that tell you that they’re in the majority somehow also believe that online spaces that are left for open discussion don’t wind up the way they want them to, almost as if they’re a minority.

        • PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Or they’re just not interested in wading through far-right extremists for 3 shitty memes.

          After all, if your theory about “open spaces turn into Nazis and pedos because most people are secretly Nazis and pedos” were actually true, those sites would be the biggest sites in the world, not tiny little bubbles that last 6 months.

      • barsquid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I think “#2 represent” is referring to their membership at freespeechextremist, so they are likely looking forward to wallowing in a festering cesspool of hatred.

        • mister_monster@monero.town
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Nah I leave that shit to the guys at the #1 spot on the list lol. I just say what I want. I’m actually not into being angry and hateful, but I’m also not into being told what I can and cannot say.

            • mister_monster@monero.town
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              It’s not about what I want to say lol typical. Take a conversation about principle and imply that I want to shout slurs.

              You don’t have the right to dictate to me what I can say out loud, period.

              • barsquid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                Who implied you want to shout slurs? I’m asking about the principle. What are you wanting to say that other instances are stopping you from saying? What is anyone even dictating that you cannot say out loud?

                • mister_monster@monero.town
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  “On principle what specific words do you want to say” lol yeah OK. You need to go understand what “principle” means, by definition it ignores specific circumstances.

                  When what I can say is subject to someone else’s dictat, de facto they have power over me. The interesting thing about that is that the kind of people that seek that out aren’t the kind of people who wield it wisely or fairly. I avoid giving others power over me, I can’t always prevent it, but I avoid it where I can. That’s the principle we are talking about, whether I want to give someone that power, not whether I agree with them on what words should be said. And that’s what this whole speech shit is about, not words, it’s about power. Generally I would agree with those people on what words should not be said, what I don’t agree with is giving them the power to tell me or other people that we can’t say them. I used to do the compromise thing, but those people inevitably overreach and begin to try to control what ideas are allowed to be discussed, because again, it’s about power and they’re power hungry subhuman scum who just want to dominate others.

                  No matter where you go on fedi, it’s one type of toxic or another. Either it’s people shouting the n word, or it’s people sharing drawings (at best) of little kids, or it’s power hungry subhuman scum who just want to dominate others. It’s an architectural problem endemic to the federated network architecture. So I prefer an architecture with less discoverability but which gives the user the power to censor their own feed how they see fit. There’s no real reach on either, but at least people can have their echo chambers and nobody can lean on the architecture to silence the people they don’t like.