It sounds way less offensive to those who decry the original terminology’s problematic roots but still keeps its meaning intact.

  • Chocrates@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    It is changing, albeit slowly. In git the default branch was changed from master to main.

    In high availability we use primary and secondary, or many other versions of the same idea (main/secondary, etc).

    Not sure how disks are handled these days but I haven’t seen the master/slave terminology in those since my first CD burner

    • wewbull@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      In git the default branch was changed from master to main.

      It wasn’t. GitHub changed.

      In high availability we use primary and secondary, or many other versions of the same idea (main/secondary, etc).

      Which is fine because in HA it’s about failover, not “who’s in control”.

      There are areas where the master/slave terminology is used because the slave does what the master says. It’s “the master has authority” not “if the master dies the slave takes over”.

      Different words mean different things.