Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-21 年前Starlink is refusing to comply with Brazil's X ban (Update: Starlink will comply)www.engadget.comexternal-linkmessage-square230fedilinkarrow-up1769arrow-down115
arrow-up1754arrow-down1external-linkStarlink is refusing to comply with Brazil's X ban (Update: Starlink will comply)www.engadget.comGhostalmedia@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-21 年前message-square230fedilink
minus-squaredb0@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up57·1 年前Controlled by governments or controlled by corpos and the super rich? I say there’s hardly an improvement.
minus-squareValmond@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·1 年前Yeah, cables or radio waves, it’s the same thing in the end. What we need (IMO) is another layer on top if the classic internet with encryption and hookers.
minus-squareValmond@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-21 年前Or Tenfingers (my network protocol for decentralised web pages and data) ofc 😌
minus-squarerkeene@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 年前This is what IPSec OE was created to solve, but nobody uses it – instead using things like TLS, which also provides protocol aware non-repudiation.
minus-squareRichard@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·1 年前No, but through the existence of both options, you can get more plurality than by using one individual option.
minus-squarezbyte64@awful.systemslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 年前If we’re talking about corporations I can only assume you mean options in how to get fucked.
minus-squareOccamsRazer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down4·1 年前Government can throw you in jail.
minus-squaredb0@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 年前Corporate throws you on the street to starve.
minus-squareOccamsRazer@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 年前They tried that with me once, but I showed them and got a different job.
minus-squaredb0@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 年前You got another one job at the the other starlink? There’s a reason the system requires a certain percentage of unemployment to keep working. There’s also a reason there’s homeless people and children living in flood security.
minus-squaredustyData@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 年前Have you heard about this corporation called the church of Latter Day Saints?
Controlled by governments or controlled by corpos and the super rich? I say there’s hardly an improvement.
Yeah, cables or radio waves, it’s the same thing in the end.
What we need (IMO) is another layer on top if the classic internet with encryption and hookers.
Like i2p or TOR?
Or Tenfingers (my network protocol for decentralised web pages and data) ofc 😌
This is what IPSec OE was created to solve, but nobody uses it – instead using things like TLS, which also provides protocol aware non-repudiation.
No, but through the existence of both options, you can get more plurality than by using one individual option.
If we’re talking about corporations I can only assume you mean options in how to get fucked.
Government can throw you in jail.
Corporate throws you on the street to starve.
They tried that with me once, but I showed them and got a different job.
You got another one job at the the other starlink?
There’s a reason the system requires a certain percentage of unemployment to keep working. There’s also a reason there’s homeless people and children living in flood security.
Have you heard about this corporation called the church of Latter Day Saints?