• SorteKanin@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    there’s a bunch of centralized authorities instead of one

    I mean sorry but that’s just what decentralization is, unless you want a fully peer-to-peer protocol which is not realistic at all.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Or, as I keep suggesting, you make the authority figures have as little power as possible, i.e. the only people with authority are mods so they only have control over communities and don’t have the power to prevent tens of thousands of people from communicating with each other.

      • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        They really have as little power as they can given the constraints. If you don’t want an admin to have power over a lot of people, join a small instance and advocate others do the same.

        It really sounds like you just want to be your own admin though. Maybe a personal instance would be a way for you.

          • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            Well other admins should be entirely in their right to cut you off. Same as anyone should be able to block you. If another admin decides to cut you off, that’s up to them, you can’t stop that and shouldn’t be able to. That is anyone’s freedom.

            But usually it is not a problem, as long as you are reasonable. Why would another admin block you if you are reasonable?

            • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 days ago

              And what I’ve been saying from the get go is that no one should have that kind of power. That you can get banned from a community is one thing, that you can get banned from all content available on one instance and that one person can decide you’re unable to communicate with tens of thousands of other users just because they don’t like your face? Well that means that Lemmy is no better than Reddit.

              Post on a community moderated by Lemmy’s main dev to share a political opinion he doesn’t agree with? Say goodbye to all Lemmy.ml users, you’re banned from the whole instance mother fucker! No one should be able to do that in a decentralized system and if that’s what people want from Lemmy then they should stop pretending it’s decentralized because it’s not.

              • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                I think you’re totally misunderstanding how decentralization works. It sounds like you think it should be a free for all and everyone should be free to access everything. But again, the fediverse is about choice. It’s totally okay for an admin to be able to cut off another instance. It’s their instance, that’s up to them. Nobody wants absolute free speech.

                If you don’t like that, go to another instance that doesn’t do that and if you get cut off from another instance by another admin, maybe consider joining that instance or another instance that isn’t defederated.

                And consider also that this power is great motivation for everyone to stay nice and well moderated. If you are mean or spammy or whatever, you get defederated. So you better be nice! That’s a great feature if you ask me.