☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to World News@lemmy.ml · 2 years agoRussia returns to top-10 world's largest economies first since 2014www.uniindia.comexternal-linkmessage-square39fedilinkarrow-up111arrow-down15
arrow-up16arrow-down1external-linkRussia returns to top-10 world's largest economies first since 2014www.uniindia.com☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to World News@lemmy.ml · 2 years agomessage-square39fedilink
minus-squareEnchantedWhetstones@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down2·2 years agoI don’t see much in common between the way leftists use “CIA”, rightists use “CIA”, and liberals use “RUSSIAN SABOTEUR!” The latter has replaced pinko. The second means Jews. The first means the actual CIA.
minus-squarek_o_t@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down6·2 years agoall of them are a useless insult used to avoid addressing the point
minus-squareEnchantedWhetstones@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·edit-22 years agoNo, you’re completely wrong. It’s entirely fair to tell people when they unwittingly reflect state department talking points. Why shouldn’t you? Because it hurts your feelings to discover you’re eating dogshit, not chocolate? Who cares? Stop eating dogshit. The other two are just fantasy.
minus-squarek_o_t@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·2 years agobecause a talking point of some state department isn’t inherently right or wrong, rather you should evaluate the point on its own merit
I don’t see much in common between the way leftists use “CIA”, rightists use “CIA”, and liberals use “RUSSIAN SABOTEUR!”
The latter has replaced pinko. The second means Jews. The first means the actual CIA.
all of them are a useless insult used to avoid addressing the point
No, you’re completely wrong. It’s entirely fair to tell people when they unwittingly reflect state department talking points.
Why shouldn’t you? Because it hurts your feelings to discover you’re eating dogshit, not chocolate? Who cares? Stop eating dogshit.
The other two are just fantasy.
because a talking point of some state department isn’t inherently right or wrong, rather you should evaluate the point on its own merit