• kimpilled@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago
    1. Russia is already using them

    2. I’ll defer to the defenders WRT what weapons they need.

          • steltek@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Your Pentagon cite is from when the conflict was less than a month old. That is worthless.

          • kimpilled@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            It may surprise you to know that in a thread where I advocate for the US giving Ukraine cluster munitions, that I don’t care that Ukraine has been using cluster munitions.

            As stated by another, your Pentagon source is out of date. It’s pretty funny though that you reject HRW saying Russia is using them, but use HRW as your source that Ukraine is.

            WRT chemical weapons: different things are different. When you can contain things in an AOR, I’m less concerned about the lingering effects. Areas can be closed off and cleared, especially when you’re the one that dropped them. That’s way less possible with chemical weapons, that will literally drift with the wind.