Sine_Fine_Belli@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.ml · 1 day agoNuclear Power Was Once Shunned at Climate Talks. Now, It’s a Rising Star.www.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square41fedilinkarrow-up1103arrow-down17
arrow-up196arrow-down1external-linkNuclear Power Was Once Shunned at Climate Talks. Now, It’s a Rising Star.www.nytimes.comSine_Fine_Belli@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.ml · 1 day agomessage-square41fedilink
minus-squareByteJunk@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·1 day agoAnd in those 6 years, you could have built over 6x that capacity in renewables, easy.
minus-squareEddoWagt@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·23 hours agoYou can also built more than 1 reactor at the same time
minus-square418_im_a_teapot@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·42 minutes agoThe same can be said of any power source?
minus-squareByteJunk@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 hours agoYou could, but with that colossal amount of resources you could have built 12x in renewables, probably more because of economy of scale. And if you decide to commit all those resources to renewables, you probably just created a booming local industry of well paying jobs.
And in those 6 years, you could have built over 6x that capacity in renewables, easy.
You can also built more than 1 reactor at the same time
The same can be said of any power source?
You could, but with that colossal amount of resources you could have built 12x in renewables, probably more because of economy of scale.
And if you decide to commit all those resources to renewables, you probably just created a booming local industry of well paying jobs.