Example: I believe that IP is a direct contradiction of nature, sacrificing the advancement of humanity and the world for selfish gain, and therefore is sinful.

Edit: pls do not downvote the comments this is a constructive discussion

Edit2: IP= intellectal property

Edit3: sort by controversal

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      20 hours ago

      I mean, it definitionally is. Even if you use a less charged synonym like “body modification of a major part”.

      The normative/moral take would be that all genital mutilation is bad.

    • andros_rex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      The big thing is just not comparing it to female circumcision. Both are fucked up, but female circumcision is done explicitly to destroy sexual function. It’s rare for male circumcision to go so wrong that all sexual function is lost, but that’s the goal of female circumcision.

      • joel_feila@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        59 minutes ago

        Male circumcision started in the usa explicitly to stop boys from masturbating. With Dr Kellogg’s goal a world of numb sex. All the health reason were either just the healthy effects of no masturbating or made after the fact.

        And that not the oldest we have writings from the early Muslim world wwre someone wrote that we do so baby associates pain with his genitals. Amd thats not the oldest record explaining male cicr as an anti sex anti pleasure.