So I guess every reaction and review on the internet that is ad supported or behind a payroll is theft too?

Firstly, most sports have an open league and a women’s league. Women can play in the “men’s” leagues if they are able. Secondly there is an olympic.sport where men and women compete against each other, dressage.

If Russia didn’t have nukes, I guarantee you they would have been invaded over their invasion of Ukraine. (Not that they would have done that without having nukes)

Yes, that is the case for being in your own timezone, but what if you are dealing with someone in another country, you will need some way to know quickly what their local dayurnal situation is. Or if you are travelling, the jet lag will be compounded by confusion.

But then we would need some method to quickly discern the relative position in the day/night cycle of a locality, perhaps some form of number to indicate the percentage of a day before or after midnight their local area is at. Then probably just add that offset so that the viewer doesn’t need to do the math everytime.

If you had told me in 2008 that electing the first black man President would create racial issues in the US, I would have said, that’s fine, we need to get passed this. If you had told me that electing Obama would have lead to President Trump, I may have voted for McCain. (Assuming I believed the foretelling)

Let’s engage in a thought experiment.

If Harris were to have negotiated a $15 minimum wage with Republicans but to do so had to give up the EPA. Would that earn your favor?

Let us assume that giving up the EPA is too much, do you see a world where the Republicans agree to anything while getting anything you are OK with giving up?

Perhaps you and the Republicans share some common wedge issue, do you think you would get any Democratic support for a bill that makes that trade?

Minimum wage is currently a partisan issue, a party that believes it should be increased and a party who doesn’t think it should exist. Just keeping it is as is is a negotiation.

This is a great example terrible AI writing.

I feel the ambiguity leans towards being misunderstood, so I think it best to clarify.

That article says that the US claims the peir area was not used as a landing zone.

4. Not having been determined via impeachment proceedings to be barred from office.

5. Having served less than two terms, however you can serve just under 10 years if you were raised to president more than half way through the term.

It was on NPR’s Up First today, and I’d read it elsewhere too.

Removed by mod

My guess

https://www.adweek.com/agencies/akqa-and-grey-merge-capabilities-across-five-territories-as-wpp-continues-efficiencies-drive/

Ok, so to be clear you only started opposition to Biden since the Israeli invasion of Gaza after October 7th?

I can understand the belief that Biden has been deficient in his response, despite the innumerable competing interests any administration would need to juggling. I had similar issues with Obama’s handling of ISIL, however I also had no better idea of how it could be handled better.

Unions oppose/opposed NATO, especially autoworkers.

Are you thinking NAFTA? I’m not sure unions have much of a position on NATO.

What makes it clear that Biden isn’t a great option? It really annoys me that such a progressive administration in a very divided government is somehow not measuring up to the ever changing goal posts. The only perfect candidate to vote for is yourself, everyone else is a compromise.

Well, I’m sure they are worried about their new deal with IBM that they’ve obviously been working on for a while.

Oops, “people who”

Firstly, there are plenty of people who believe that humans have made terrible mistakes when selectively breeding dogs. See the oft-reposted “dog breeds then be now” image. Which leads into the primary technical reason eugenics doesn’t work, the fallibility of human decision making combined with the lack of perfect information.

Some traits may seem undesirable, however biodiversity is very important for survivability, and we are already very non-diverse genetically. Consider sickle cell anemia, a blood disease caused by a genetic trait. However part of the trait that causes it also offers protection from malaria.

Second is the controversial aspect. Who gets to decide which traits are desirable? If left up to individuals we would be awash with poorly informed trends, but if some central authority were given control, it could never be apolitical and would certainly devolve from any scientific basis into ideology.