I’m waiting on a data request for the rest of my history, though I did that 6mo ago for other reasons and still have it so if the delay is too long I’ll just lose those months.

After that I’ll probably keep my account for a while to spam about Lemmy until I get banned.

At least we can agree that one of us is hilariously incorrect.

All of Europe works as puppet states to the US

Or they just have reasonably aligned interests and you’ve completely misunderstood the concept of a puppet state.

I don’t know if ‘sleepwalking’ is the right word. Is there a condition where one side of the brain is a asleep while the other is screaming for it to wake the hell up?

I’m hoping it’ll be more like craft beer and become it’s own market that overlaps with more mainstream options but still has a solid base of users\customers that keep it separate.

I enjoy reading your interpretation of this conversation.

I think you should just stick to the idea that self-righteousness means ‘telling people what to do’. That seems to be as far as you can go with this. Do another ‘cognitive dissonance test’ on me- that was funny.

I know you won’t understand any of this but I’m bored.

You actually can tell people not to celebrate death, for instance if it’s your family member- you’re within your rights to be upset because you have a relationship with that person. So if you think Pat Robinson was a good dude, it’s actually not as self-righteous to say “Stop that, he was a good guy!”. That would be silly for other reasons though.

But if you don’t have a dog in the fight, it’s pretty self-righteous and morally superior to just rant that strangers can’t be glad someone that caused them pain is dead. Not everyone shares the vacuous sentiment that the dead should be uncritically revered and expecting them to is as silly as them expecting you to celebrate with them, but I haven’t seen anyone asking for that.

As far as telling people not to murder… yeah- actions and words are inherently distinct. Hilariously weak point but I do like the energy.

If binary thinking is all you’re capable of I’d say you should err on the side of caution and just never tell anyone what to do. It’s more complex than that but clearly this is your limit.

So you think the act of murder is comparable to how one speaks of a dead person?

lol- how is that related to this conversation?

The demonstration of self-righteousness was preaching to strangers about how they should feel about a dead person. If you genuinely don’t understand how that is self-righteous, well… that makes this even more fun somehow.

I don’t need to demonstrate it, you already did.

The fact that you think it requires any ‘defense’ is kind of funny.

I won’t google the definition of words for you. But it’s very self-righteous and morally superior if you ever get around to looking those up.

Right, their feelings about a dead hatemonger are none of your business so ‘calling them out’ is painfully self-righteous.

Clutch those pearls!

You’re an archivist. Though I like that you own the term ‘data hoarder’ so nobody can use it as a pejorative.

So besides owning any electronic device what are some other examples of common moral failings that you think equate to Robinson’s hateful career? Driving a car?

I think that would be great. There’s a wealth of posts and comments that users have made that deserve to be preserved and shared. It would help Lemmy grow and just be a good policy to make sure Reddit doesn’t control access to the content those users generated.

As long as you link or referce back to the post and user I don’t see how that would be legally or morally problematic. It’s all public anyway, but IANAL so this this not legal advice, just my thoughts.