• scoobford@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    No. Imagining an independent future for any state (including California and Texas) is pure cope. The states are so interdependent that attempting to secede would be ruinous for the state in question.

    The only exceptions I can think of are Alaska and Hawaii, which might be able to survive if they found another country to keep them supplied and economically connected.

  • Paradachshund@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Washingtonian here, I’ve been saying this should happen for like 8 years now lmao

    The marriage isn’t working. Let it go.

    • wolfinthewoods@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      7 days ago

      We have had a name for it for awhile, my fellow Washingtonians call the Washington/Oregon/California union ‘Cascadia’. Wouldn’t be such a bad idea.

      • -☆-@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 days ago

        Fuck yeah! Cascadia! Let us stop funding this awful government and actually put our taxes towards improving people’s lives

      • Paradachshund@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 days ago

        Absolutely, and I’m about ready to start identifying as that over American 🫠.

        I usually think of BC being part of it, too, cause we’re so similar culturally, and we hang out on each other’s side of the made up invisible line all the time.

        One can dream!

      • invertedspear@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 days ago

        If you don’t take AZ and NV with you, you will get your Colorado River water cut off and lose a lot of farming power. That might even require UT. Unless it’s only Northern California included, in which case you still lose that agriculture, and possible land based trade lines to Mexico. It’s not a clean and pretty separation.

        • conditional_soup@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          That is a problem, but not an intractable one. The first easy win would be to just stop wasting so much water. CA could be a lot more careful with water than it is by just leaning on industry and ag to cut wasteful water use harder than it leans on the suburbs. Don’t get me wrong, green lawns in our Mediterranean climate are a stupid waste too, but it pencils out to less than a percent of all water use, where ag and industry are both in the double digits.

  • PTSDwarrior@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Yes. In fact, I’ve decided to take a leap of faith and join the California National Party, which you can all check out here: CNP website. I am sick of the usual Republicans vs Democrats. Everytime one party is in power, we are constantly worrying about the loss of civil and human rights. Lets start with a clean slate. If you are a California resident, at least check out their party platform. Also, in 2026, there will be a gubernatorial candidate for CNP. His name is Sean Forbes.

      • vfreire85@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        but mexico has got way more parties than pri, so much that most candidates winning elections do so with a broad alliance. in fact since 2000 pri only had a single term.

      • PTSDwarrior@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        I’m not sure where you got that we only want one party in an independent California? Once CNP successfully fights for independence, then other parties can spring up. For example, in South Africa, the African National Congress were the big fighters against apartheid. No they are just another (corrupt) political party. Another example is the Indian National Congress. Members of that party fought for independence from the UK. Now, its just another political party, and they have not had any sort of power since 2014. CNP would have a place in an independent California. But the future after that, up in the air.

  • Melllvar@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Californian. No.

    It wouldn’t solve any problems that can’t be solved by other means, and it would create new problems that we haven’t had to worry about before. It’d be a net loss for everyone involved.

    • quetzaldilla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      We’d have to spend a fortune on defense.

      We’d suffer massive losses from being cut off from interstate trade agreements.

      We’d have to deal with massive immigration issues.

      We’d probably get our shit pushed in from all the federal military bases within the state.

      I think it’s waaaay easier to just oust the current leadership and remove all the Congress members that aided and abetted.

  • kingthrillgore@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Coloradan. Only if a neighboring State does, because if not, we are neighboring other borders and we would be landlocked without food or water imports. Its either all Pacific and Front Range States agree we have to split, or none of us can.

    Our most populous cities, Denver and CO Springs, are below the mountains, and are screwed in a combat scenario.

    I don’t see Utah, Wyoming, Nevada, or Kansas doing so willingly.

  • BlueCollarRockstar@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Indiana. We’d fail so hard and so fast that I literally cannot imagine it. People are nuts. It’d be instant MAGA-flavored Mad Max if they felt like they had an excuse to preemptively defend themselves with their guns across the countryside.

    • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 days ago

      Alabama. Not enough federal money in the world to keep that state afloat.

      If they split from the Union, everyone starves.

  • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 days ago

    If the Union completely dissolved and each state had to function as nation, it would be a massive boom for the oligarchs. They already have more money than most states.

    • Revan343@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      I imagine they’d form blocs, one centred on California obviously, one on the other coast, and a few in between

  • pleasegoaway@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    6 days ago

    I like the idea of it, but California is a cash cow and the US would never let that cash cow get away.