cross-posted from: https://slrpnk.net/post/26445083

Cartwright described for Rolling Stone a years-long struggle to keep kids safe at school. “Munitions and tear gas — we aren’t new to this,” she says. “We’d been next to the ICE building the whole time.” She emphasized that the school has coexisted “harmoniously with the protesters,” but adds: “Our issue is the chemical weapons being used against them that were impacting our space.”

But as the intensity of the conflict rose, it soon became clear that the school would have to make a dramatic change. “We were getting nightly reports that green gas was enveloping our garden — our edible garden — and all of the different chemicals were impacting our soil.” Cottonwood faced the costly prospect of constant testing and remediation, or being unable to use its outdoor spaces. When the bottom dropped out of enrollment, the school chose to relocate to a recently vacant middle-school campus where Cottonwood could take over the lease.

  • j_roby@slrpnk.netOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    22 hours ago

    This is a really great write-up, buts it’s a shame that the article does not mention that the building the school is moving into is owned by the same people that own the ICE building…

    https://www.streetroots.org/news/2025/08/05/k-8-school-next-door-portland-ice-facility-plans-immediate-move

    But several board members, staff and students’ parents said moving to the Bridges building could leave immigrant students at risk.

    That building is owned by local real estate company Lindquist Development, which also owns the building ICE leases. Stuart Linquist, the company’s president, struck a protester with his Mercedes outside the ICE facility in 2018, and later threatened to fight anti-ICE protestors in an interview with Willamette Week about the incident.

    Some Cottonwood staff and board members fear Lindquist could allow ICE agents into the building while students are in classes, according to sources who spoke to Street Roots on condition of anonymity.

    • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Its also a Charter School so… look, I actually went to a REALLY good charter school and think it changed the course of my life. But the vast majority are scams that cut every corner due to lessened regulations.

      And considering this all spun out not from “we can’t teach under these circumstances” and instead “the constant chemical warfare is lowering our enrollment rates”: They were gonna let ICE in regardless.

      • Bosco@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        20 hours ago

        My children attended this school until recently, it was initially a very good environment for a less factory-learning structure, especially for less conformist children; we moved them before the protests and responses were an alleged driving factor for relocating. There was already an exodus in progress once the protests were in full swing due to alarming turnover rates among the teaching staff throughout the year as well as multiple issues with the now-removed principal and much of the board (spoiler: lots of turnover there too).

        The board (old and new) has consistently tried to operate behind closed doors, stifle parental/community input at meetings, and actively ignores their bylaws/rules/policies as it suits their interests. The meetings leading up to their announcing the move barely pretended to hold to posted agendas or consider the limited input they allowed.

        General consensus among most parents that attended/participated board meetings recently was that they (board) were actively trying to spin an excuse to lease from Lundquist (guy that owns the ICE building) with many questioning if one or more members had personal/financial ties to him. Other facilities not mentioned in the article were aggressively dismissed by the board during meetings leading up to the announcement for arbitrary reasons without exploring remedies or workarounds to their declared obstacles, seemingly to create their “we only have two options” narrative they pushed in the article.

      • fartographer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        21 hours ago

        I worked for a STEM company that was hired to augment lessons and classes, primarily at charter schools. Most of the schools I visited were obvious scams and a few would disappear mid-year.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        Not a fan of charter schools either, but that doesn’t seem related to this in any way. This is still a school full of children being exposed to this bullshit.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        I actually went to a REALLY good charter school and think it changed the course of my life. But the vast majority are scams that cut every corner due to lessened regulations.

        The fundamental goal of the charter school as a model is to cut the parents and the teachers out of the job of administering the school. Great that we can point to some number of charter schools where things haven’t gone to shit. But they’re still just trying to ignore the Private Equity Value Eating Machine and hoping it doesn’t roll over them next.

        Says something that the school was moved under ICE’s privatized landlord. It really feels like a deliberate play to extort the charter.

        They were gonna let ICE in regardless.

        Arm the Teachers