• ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    99
    ·
    18 hours ago

    This particular murder is a challenge to the rule of law as a basic principle in a way that, for example, multiple murders by a serial killer are not. The serial killer does more direct harm, but IMO this murder requires more forceful repudiation by society.

    • Tippy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      17 hours ago

      What do we do about the murder of thousands by using AI to refuse medical care, and instead funnel the profits to shareholder portfolios?

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      16 hours ago

      And what exactly makes this one worse than others?

      The victim being rich and powerful, unlike most murder victims?

      The victim belonging to a group of people very lucrative to the powers that be?

      The fact that your favorite authoritarian politicians and talking heads said so on tv?

      • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        9 hours ago

        The aggravating factor is not the identity of the victim but rather the intent of the murderer. There have already been two more murders inspired at least partially by the murder of Brian Thompson (at least to the extent that the killers also wrote messages on the shell casings). If the rule of law is to be preserved, then it must be made clear that those who try to use violence as a tool for extralegal social change will not succeed, and that they will be punished severely.

        • 5too@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          The problem with this line of thinking is that people like Brian Thompson are excused entirely. How much pain, suffering, and unnecessary death did Brian Thompson enable with his policies? And what recourse did his victims have?

          Fix that problem, and attacks like this don’t happen in the first place.

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 hours ago

          The aggravating factor is not the identity of the victim but rather the intent of the murderer

          I’d personally argue that the motive is a huge mitigating factor in this case. Especially when you consider the hell that the insurance industry leeches put him and his family through.

          IF it’s even him, that is.

          If the rule of law is to be preserved, then it must be made clear that those who try to use violence as a tool for extralegal social change will not succeed, and that they will be punished severely.

          I’m of the opinion that law doesn’t automatically equal justice and that justice is MUCH more important than law.

          Which is why I consider illegal but justifiable actions against legally entrenched injustice much less egregious than that which is unjust but perfectly legal.

    • F_State@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      16 hours ago

      This particular murder is a challenge more to the system of control than to the rule of law. It’s not society but the oligarchy who believe it requires a more forceful repudiation. Otherwise power might start to shift out of their hands and back to the people.

    • titanicx@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Why I think we should give this man a trophy and a lifetime supply of chocolate. Anybody that kills the Nazi should be given the same treatment that our world war II soldiers were given. Fucking ticker tape parade for this motherfucker.

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Maybe if the rule of law was doing it’s fucking job and punishing these insurance bastards like they deserve randos wouldn’t have to gun them down in the street. Society should be grateful SOMEONE did something about it.

      • 5too@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        From what I’ve been hearing, society IS grateful.

        Just not the billionaires, and the media they control is how they voice it.

    • danc4498@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I guess it makes sense. A principled murder needs harsher punishment than even a serial killer… That’s the theory anyway.