In a scene reminiscent of the film “Groundhog Day,” the U.S. Navy has canceled the Constellation-class frigate program, with only the first two ships, which are already under construction, scheduled for completion.

The program was terminated due to production delays, escalating costs, and design challenges stemming from adapting a foreign design to meet U.S. requirements. The funds from the canceled frigates will be reallocated to other ships that can be produced more quickly.

The Constellation-class frigate program was intended to be a “low-risk” approach, basically a slam-dunk to building a new frigate, but it underwent significant changes to its Italian FREMM-based design, making it heavier, more expensive, and less aligned with its original blueprints.

  • mx_smith@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    20 hours ago

    If they built the amphibious assault ships to look like this, then they could fill them with Cybertrucks and anytime the US invaded a country it would be horrific and comical at the same time.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Maybe they could use the boat materials to build some sort of arch. A triumphant arch.

  • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    This is such an incredibly dumb decision. This was going to be the direction the navy went in - more vessels that are capable in aggregate, but no single one as too big of a target. Datalink handoff. Sensor fusion.

    But they’re probably gonna make a new class of battleship or something idiotically obsolete like that.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      18 hours ago

      They’ll start down that path, spend billions on starting up the program, then a new president comes in and cancels that to return to the smaller ship philosophy and spends billions to start down that path again.

    • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      20 hours ago

      Sure, you know everyone’s favorite ship, the aircraft carrier, well wait till you meet the drone carrier! It’s just as big for some reason, but it mostly carries drones and guided missiles and it probably sails alongside a traditional carrier, because it can’t actually perform all of the same duties. This is how we’ll be able to spend more than ever before.

  • favoredponcho@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    1 day ago

    Reminds me of those littoral combat ships that were built in Alabama and were garbage quality — loads of problems and can’t even defend themselves. Navy tried to stop spending on them but Congressman Bradley Byrne from Alabama keeps forcing it in to the budget.

  • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m pretty sure that’s just the inevitable consequence of decades of under-regulated capitalism and cronyism letting the arms dealers set their own prices and conditions.

    Personally, I consider the most bloated military in the history of the world not being able to expand or even replace its flotilla a huge win though, regardless of the reasons 🤷

  • nebajoth@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    I do wonder what the advent of drone warfare, including the marine drones used in the black sea against Russia, and the Taiwanese investment in drones for defense against China, has done to impact the outlook and priorities of the US Navy. It may very well be that it has changed the assessment of whether to purchase large expensive ships.

  • commander@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    Let’s see if the coast guard is happy with the new patrol ship once one of those are finished. If the coast guard fails too, pretty entertaining incompetence