Modern AI data centers consume enormous amounts of power, and it looks like they will get even more power-hungry in the coming years as companies like Google, Microsoft, Meta, and OpenAI strive towards artificial general intelligence (AGI). Oracle has already outlined plans to use nuclear power plants for its 1-gigawatt datacenters. It looks like Microsoft plans to do the same as it just inked a deal to restart a nuclear power plant to feed its data centers, reports Bloomberg.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    I remember I had to do the 3 mile Island incident as part of my university degree. Apparently one of the biggest problems was that the control interface was hard to understand for the human operators.

    So I guess if they just replaced the control system with a modern computer that would fix most of the problems. Obviously not a Windows system, otherwise we’ve just got the same issue all over again.

    • 🐍🩶🐢@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      It was the SCADA view right? A lot of SCADA software is basically running on top of windows, though you typically would never see the desktop. Ignition at least is cross platform, but that is because the server is Java and Jython. A big part of why things are running on windows is due to OPC, which was traditionally all DOM and .NET. It is basically a standard communications protocol and is what allows your HMI/SCADA to communicate with PLCs. Otherwise, you use proprietary drivers and native PLC specific protocols.

      SCADA programming/design is kind of an art and is usually written by an either an overworked engineer or someone who had far too much time on their hands. You basically build screens using specialized software, hook up buttons and UI elements to PLC signals, and pass some signals from the UI to the PLC. They are all heading in the Edge/iot/cloud/web based/techno-babble direction these days…

      Ignition, programming software is free!: https://inductiveautomation.com

      Some other random ones I have seen or used in the past: https://www.siemens.com/global/en/products/automation/simatic-hmi/wincc-unified.html https://www.aveva.com/en/products/intouch-hmi/ https://www.rockwellautomation.com/en-us/products/software/factorytalk/operationsuite/view.html

      • CLOTHESPlN@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 month ago

        “is usually written by an over worked engineer”

        I’m in this post and I don’t like it.

        But really these scada systems are rarely well defined by the time implementation happens. Often the architect has a great plan, but by the time it’s passed to a manager, a non-software engineer, to the product engineer to the automation team to the contractor the end result is “X data is pushed in With Y form and we use either a,b,or c date time stamp any nobody knows”

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      It continued operating for decades after the event. I’m sure they already solved that issue. It can still be improved I’m sure though.

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      So I guess if they just replaced the control system with a modern computer that would fix most of the problems

      Introducing new Clippy For Reactors.