That’s all.

EDIT: Thank you all for detailing your experience with, and hatred for, this miserable product. Your display of solidarity is inspiring. Now, say it with me:

Fuck Microsoft

  • Ⓜ3️⃣3️⃣ 🌌@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    Yes. Typical MS corporate BS. Take “inspiration” from slack and zoom, make it great to steal the market, then make it worse and more expensive every once and a while.

  • Rolivers@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 days ago

    I don’t mind teams for chatting or meetings but I hate sharepoint and the Teams file “structure” with a passion.

  • kamen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    While I’m not saying it’s perfect, I still think it’s aeons better than Skype was shortly after its acquisition by Microsoft.

  • paddirn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 days ago

    I don’t have any strong feelings about Teams. It just is what it is. It’s a chat app for work, like it’s just there to spy on me and keep me in contact with co-workers. It’s whatever. Of all the things I think about in the day, Teams is not one of them.

  • cybermass@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    If teams was just teams and didn’t have all this cross integration bullshit with OneDrive/SharePoint and Todo and viva I wouldn’t mind it.

    But no, it has to be part of the ecosystem 🤮

    Why do they want IT admins to be useless?

    • PlantJam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      There shouldn’t be worms in the poop of a healthy dog. This analogy just keeps getting better and more accurate.

    • danc4498@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      9 days ago

      Oooh, I hate it so bad…… I used to click “Save” and my word document would ask to save in the only folder I save ALL my documents in. Change the name, save, so easy!

      Now it asks if I want to save to OneDrive… Fuck No Mr Paperclip! I want it in the folder I always use and don’t want to have to select “Other” then dig through screens to select the thing I use every time!

    • tibi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 days ago

      Onedrive is pretty ok, other than being annoying. A company I worked for was acquired by another company that had their own cloud storage product. After the acquisition, they forced us to migrate from onedrive to their product. It was so bad… Files would constantly corrupt and disappear, the speed was terrible, trying to share files didn’t work half the time, when sharing folders the people you shared with wouldn’t see all the files in the folder. They also limited our storage from 1TB to 25GB making it pretty useless for storing builds of our product or trying to share VMs.

      And the worst part is that they also closed our SMB network share to force us to use that piece of shit.

      After that experience, I will never complain about Onedrive again.

    • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      103
      ·
      9 days ago

      The new outlook has exceeded “garbage” and gone all the way to dumpster fire. It sometimes takes upwards of 15, 30 seconds to open an email. The new auto formatting is a hindrance to be overcome by tricking it to act how you want. Trying to schedule an event across timezones shits the bed half the time, resulting in improper meeting times being sent out. Absolute failure.

      • Gork@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        9 days ago

        New Outlook also doesn’t support Really Simple Syndication, which I used a lot with the Old Outlook.

        So back to old Outlook I go.

      • capt_kafei@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 days ago

        Wait, really? I’ve found the new outlook opens emails faster than the old one, especially the HTML-heavy ones that my work loves to send me.

        The refactor to the rules UI is really nice too, the old one was so crusty. Can’t comment on the timezone issue though.

        • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          9 days ago

          I’ve been told the extended time to open is related to how big the outlook database is, I average 200 emails received a day with various alerts and notifications from internal tools and it cripples new outlook in about a week if I’m not diligent with keeping folders cleaned out/emails deleted. This volume wasn’t a issue before I switched.

          • Albbi@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            9 days ago

            Ah so your issue is, let me see here… Ah, actually using Outlook like a normal user.

            I’ve tried switching to Thunderbird myself but it doesn’t support Office 365 without a third party service. So I feel stuck with Outlook.

            • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              9 days ago

              Ah, actually using Outlook like a normal user.

              Ha, right? I’m keeping my fingers crossed there is some executive at MS raging and it will get resolved before they force everyone off the legacy version. Surely there are people inside their organization with tons more traffic than I see.

              • Thetimefarm@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 days ago

                There’s probably a microsoft engineer out there somewhere sitting in a cubical who has the solution already written and tested and they just can’t figure out how to send it to their boss. They’ve tried outlook, teams, github, skype, and even one drive but they’re all so broken that it may just be faster to print the code out and mail it.

      • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 days ago

        My CISO has all but said he’s going to prevent any auto-rollout of that shit because it breaks decades of user training and TRUNCATES THE FRONT OF THE URL, NOT THE BACK LIKE ANY SENSIBLE APPLICATION.

        Like, let’s make it so Steve in accounting can’t see that the login link he wants to click is actually haxxor.com instead of bank.com, makes perfect fucking sense.

      • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 days ago

        I accidentally switched to it and it dropped all my non-MS mailboxes. Then when I immediately switched back it had the gall to ask me why.

      • Jeffool @lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        I will give respect where due: I like the sweep button. It’s handy for me personally, as someone who is on several email lists that are public-facing. That’s about it.

        Every attempt to help me automatically is a pain. Like most things in this vein it never learns what you’re trying to do, only what they would do in a given scenario that’s vaguely like ours.

        • theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          I think there’s tons of things I love for it to do for me automatically - there’s all sorts of quality of life features that I only notice when they change it, usually without bothering to tell me. And now, my muscle memory is leading to unexpected behavior, and it’ll take me weeks to learn to stop doing that, and a few more months of training to learn the new muscle memory as I relapse at all the worst times

          Some of it is straight up better, some of it is great new capabilities, but in the last few years? All that comes to mind is I thought it was pretty cool they added auto responses, even if I never actually use them. Doesn’t change existing behavior, just adds a new option that’s not in the way

          But then the auto complete - I hate it so much. And I love auto complete - except it’s the fucking opposite behavior of every IDE out there, including Microsoft’s! I can’t even unlearn it, because it’s a core part of my workflow!

          So now, I constantly have to delete things I never wanted to say, and I delete the things I thought sounded good.

          I like new features and the computer doing things for me automagically… But I’d rather them to just stop at this point

    • stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      9 days ago

      I’ll die on the hill that classic outlook is far better than Gmail and similar web interfaces for email especially if you have long threads or lots of emails.

      Also somehow Google’s email search sucks so bad compared to searching in outlook.

        • pressanykeynow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          9 days ago

          It’s actually disturbing that Thunderbird is the only good smtp/imap client available and it’s not receiving that much funding.

      • Scrollone@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 days ago

        I agree. The old Outlook was snappy and dense of information. The new Outlook is just a fucking web page.

    • bulwark@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      If I’m being honest the only Microsoft product I actually like is Excel.

      • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        They’re doing their best to “improve” excel too… I can’t understand how their AI generated cell fill is worse than the old approach.

  • Squorlple@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    164
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 days ago

    Microsoft Teams isn’t all bad! For example, it bogged down my work computer so much at start up that I would basically get an extra break.

    • marcos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      64
      ·
      9 days ago

      It temporarily deletes my meetings just before they happen, so that I don’t have to attend them!

      Of course, when I open it later, the meetings are restored, with the original date, and no trace of the deletion. So not attending them is quite hard to explain to others. But it does save me from attending!

      • Avatar_of_Self@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Just do in what I do. Don’t join meetings most of the time. That way when you do it is noteworthy to the meeting stakeholder.

        Yeah sure my manglers through the years try to have ‘the talk’ but after awhile of training them via sheer apathy they shut the fuck up.

        I solve complex problems, get my tasks done, I’m independent and I stay busy because I’ll get bored. Most meetings could just be an email. There’s no real collaboration except managers or scrum masters asking what your blockers are but not actually doing anything about it. If I think the meeting will be a waste of my time I just don’t show up.

  • taiyang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    122
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    What blows my mind is MS fucking bought Skype and somehow Teams still can’t handle video calls correctly. The actual fuck did they do with that acquisition?

    • Evil_incarnate@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      73
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      9 days ago

      Skype used to be peer to peer. Your call went from you to your friend (whomever). Microsoft decided that they couldn’t mitm that setup to scrape data; so, soon after they acquired Skype, they made all calls go through their servers.

      Then they tried to make Skype make more money, since those servers aren’t free. Then they made teams and copied half the code into that, and cludged the rest to make it hold together.

      • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        62
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        9 days ago

        In mean aside from the fact that almost all of that story is completely wrong, it’s a good story.

        Source: Used to work at Microsoft and worked a lot with people from the Skype team.

          • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            96
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            Skype made the call negotiation go through a central server (as does all systems nowadays). Skype was originally built on Kazaa technology to punch through firewalls without a central coordinator and that’s what Microsoft removed. They didn’t remove it to track the calling but to enable larger group calls on weaker devices which required video mixing on a central system rather than peer to peer call (where weaker peers couldn’t decode that many video streams). Calls up to 4 are still routed peer to peer if the backend can find routes through all firewalls.

            Very very little of Skype was in the new Teams if anything. Teams was a rewrap of Communicator calling tech and was a response to Slack. The real time chatting had nothing to do with Skype either.

            Skype lingered in Microsoft for a couple of reasons; Microsoft was crap at acquiring businesses back then, thinking that a hands off approach was best. It meant Skype never really became a proper Microsoft team - they still felt and acted like Skype employees and they didn’t manage to affect Redmond very well. Being acquired is super hard especially when almost all of the bigger business was in a different time zone and a different culture.

            I was at a leadership development workshop with a tonne of Skype leaders about 10 years ago. They were still feeling incredibly frustrated and not understanding what was expected of them. It was a botched acquisition and the fault was on both sides.

            • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 days ago

              So Teams calls of 1-4 people can send traffic direct peer-to-peer if they’re on the same LAN right?
              Do all calls of 5+ users stay centrally hosted on the cloud? These are the kinds of things that MS should document and make easily available for IT and firewall admins. Finding info on Teams ports wasn’t easy in my experience.

              • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                8 days ago

                You’re way outside my scope of knowledge - I know a bit about the decisions they took 10 years, and not very much on what is happening today. I would imagine some of these limits are configurable and dynamic. I really don’t know.

          • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            28
            ·
            9 days ago

            They probably used Chat-GPT which at the time…

            Ok Mr Chat I need to rewrite the Skype code to look more like what we have been doing at Microsoft…

            Oh my! It keeps crashing my PC, can you do a little less crash and more icons and shit?

            Oh, it crashed my PC once more. How about this time no crash?

            Dude, I said no crash! But nice graphics! Can you make the people icons at least 25% of the total screen real estate? And can you also hide the full screen icon into at least half an hour of clicks? Yeah make it real hidden!

            Fantastic work on the full screen thing! Could you not make it like anything Microsoft has made before up to the point where it can actually run?

            Good job at sending all my information to random strangers! Many points for that! And the icons! Soo big and beautiful! Thanks Chat-GPT! Bill! We’re ready to release!

              • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                8 days ago

                I’ve been using teams for 3 or 4 years before the pandemic… So maybe around 2015? I gotta Google check that. But then before it was called teams it was called Skype. I recall the thing had a shitty transition to becoming teams.

        • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 days ago

          You should write a post sometime about what you know from the internals of Skype. I would read it.

          • pivot_root@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 days ago

            And at least garbage let you make international calls with the money you put into it. Nitro-saturated sewer water gives you what—a bit of extra bandwidth utilization, 2 free tokens to prove you’re above the poverty line, and discounts on paid cosmetics?

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      9 days ago

      How the fuck did they let motherfucking Zoom take over. The video-call equivalent of “Googling” something was to “Skype.” When Covid hit, Microsoft screwed the pooch horribly.

      My sister is super high ranking at Microsoft, and when she calls the family, she uses Zoom.

    • Magister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      Well, I’m a unix guy for 30 years and hated M$ bill gates blablabla and forced to use windows at work etc. Teams was somewhat bad at the beginning, especially start of covid pandemic , I’m using Teams multiple times daily for ~5 years now. But since ~1 year it handles video call pretty nicely, 20+ feeds, share screens, whiteboard, etc. it’s pretty stable at least, don’t crash anymore, and we can have multiple accounts. It took times to reach this state I agree…

      • Justin@lemmy.jlh.name
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        In the past two years, I have had horrible issues where it decides that I’m not allowed to join the call because I have a Teams account logged into a different organization, that it won’t let me log out of. An issue where Microsoft servers just time out if you have ipv6 enabled, etc.

        Don’t get me started on Skype for Business. It’s still around.

        • taiyang@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          9 days ago

          Oh yeah, that multiple organizations things absolutely fuuuucks me since I’m adjunct at multiple universities/colleges. It keeps trying to default me to a place I don’t even work at anymore and somehow still refuses to let me leave it without reinstalling Windows (which I won’t do as I’ll be moving to Linux full time once I do).

      • Vikthor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        Teams are losing parts of text chat conversations for me. Not sure if that’s issue of their PWA on Linux or just an issue in general…

        • Magister@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          PWA in Linux is unusable yep, with FF or Edge, super buggy.

          I’m using Teams in Windows, I have a software KVM to move between my Linux PC and work windows laptop

    • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      The core of what made Skype great was made by a team of engineers in Estonia. Once it got acquired most of those people left the company. Many of them ended up at Twilio.

  • magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    9 days ago

    I was expecting a detailed rant, including an example or two. “That’s all” is much, much funnier.

  • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    9 days ago

    Is there a Microsoft product that isn’t?

    To be fair, Teams is pretty bad even for MS. I’ve never seen something do so relatively little and still perform so poorly. When I switched jobs and got to use Slack it was like a great fog being lifted off of my being.

      • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        Ah yes, you’re right.

        I guess a better qualifier might be: closed-source Microsoft products tend overwhelmingly to suck.

      • chakan2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        VS Code is OK if you can’t afford the JetBrains ultimate subscription. I never want to see a VS Code launch configuration again.

          • chakan2@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 days ago

            Agreed…the community editions of their tools are solid, but if you’re doing cloud stuff, get your company to pay for it. It blows VS Code out of the water.

          • Rimu@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 days ago

            Ehh, it’s ok in the case of JetBrains - if your subscription lapses your license converts to a ‘perpetual fallback license’ so can just continue using the version you installed when the subscription was originally purchased.

            I’m using a 4 year old version of PhpStorm with no issues and no subscription. My PyCharm sub ended 6 months ago and I’m staying on the 2023 version of PyCharm because the latest version comes with lots of AI which makes my CPU fans scream continuously.

        • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          WebStorm and Rider will have community versions soon, they are going to eat VS Code’s lunch.

      • GreenSofaBed@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 days ago

        They’ve been cramming random stuff in that though that’s making it more laggy. Recently switched to Zed and it’s so much faster.

      • pivot_root@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        TypeScript isn’t terrible. It’s extra work to set up, but it makes JavaScript codebases somewhat more maintainable.

      • AccountMaker@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        Some C/C++ extension process once reduced my laptop to a crawl, and I couldn’t close VS Code, so I killed the process through the task manager, simple enough, right?

        Long story short, I started smelling burning plastic and saw that, somehow, there was no VS Code process, but the extension had a separate process that was still running at full speed doing idk what. I almost burned myself when I picked up my laptop. So I’m not very happy when I see VS Code

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          Your laptop caught fire while running vs code it had nothing to do with it, it doesn’t have a “burn my laptop” function.

    • Godort@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Excel, Active Directory, and to a somewhat lesser degree MSSQL.

          • towerful@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 days ago

            Excel is great.
            It does so much that people make it do what it shouldn’t, and never think to explore technologies beyond it… Like a proper fucking database.
            Then you get garbage business systems based on fragile excel sheets with bonkers macros and weird ETL pipelines to sync things.
            And never try to deal with dates and timezones.

            • T156@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              9 days ago

              And never try to deal with dates and timezones.

              Or anything that looks like dates.

              Gene scientists had to revise their whole naming scheme because Excel would see MARCH1 (Membrane-Associated Ring-CH-Finger Type 1), and ‘helpfully’ convert it into a date, rendering it useless (since it uses timestamps on the backend).

              It’s bad enough that my data science course recommended against opening CSV files in Excel, because it would edit the file to do the conversion, even before you explicitly saving, mangling your data before you could process it.

            • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 days ago

              Reminds me of my last job where I had to build a ridiculously complex excel spreadsheet that I copied a bunch of reports into to do scheduling because someone decided I didn’t need access to the actual data…

          • circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 days ago

            It’s an awful mix of half-assed approaches to things. Awkward syntax on everything and very poor at recognizing what types of data it is handling.

            Open a CSV in a fresh Excel install. It will almost certainly mistake something for a date if the CSV is sufficiently large (unless the user is exceedingly explicit at changing settings for that particular CSV). It will reformat that data as a date, and as an added bonus, since Autosave is on by default, it’ll save that reformatted data back into your CSV. Yes, settings can be changed to avoid these things. But why isn’t it just designed better so as to avoid it altogether?

            If that was just a natural side effect of spreadsheet apps, I could understand it. But LibreOffice Calc is a million times better at recognizing what types of data it is handling, so it seems to just be Excel’s shittiness.

            The fact that it also hasn’t really changed beyond aesthetics since 2004 is just… wild.

            • jacecomix@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              9 days ago

              Can confirm. I’ve sent csv files to my coworkers, and they’ve tried to tell me that the files I sent were invalid. It’s because they opened up the file in Excel to look at it first, and Excel autosaved the reformatted data.

    • AWittyUsername@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 days ago

      C#, technically not a product but it’s pretty great. The first few Xboxes, but that’s going back a bit.

      Windows pre 8.

      Microsoft Excel is goat for spreadsheets.

      Erm. Can’t think of any more.

      • rdri@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        Windows 8.1 was great, you just have to enable the start button and disable Metro. It’s basically a faster Windows 7.

    • QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      I must be the only one who prefers Teams over Slack. I just don’t like its design. Nothing makes sense to me in how it operates. But then again, Trams runs fine for me. No slow downs or deleting things that others have mentioned.

    • pinkystew@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      I have an old Microsoft brand thumb drive that fits perfectly into my ass and makes me nut every time