• Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I only like the first three Harry Potter books, when Scabbers goes, so does the book having any credibility it seems.

    People don’t like Harry Potter for the story, so when it tries too be serious it falls apart. The part of Harry Potter people enjoy is the whimsy of the wizarding world, that’s it.

    • rowdyrockets@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      You don’t speak for all people. No doubt what you said is true for some. My favorite books were 4 and 5.

    • Benaaasaaas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Same with Fantastic Beasts, first one was just a whimsical adventure of Newt, second one tried to be serious and was a steaming pile of 💩

    • mlg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      For me it’s always the unexplained power nerfing that authors do just to advance the plot.

      Harry Potter in the first 3 books was fearless, he literally took on voldemort with his bare hands.

      Then when the dumbass plan with the port key cup happens, he just stands there like an idiot as the rat dude kills Cedric and revives Voldemort as if both he and Cedric don’t have wands that allow them to cast spells.

      I mean they could have maybe had like 20 wizards camping the graveyard to make escaping impossible, but nah they really tried to make the coward rat guy seem like he was now somehow more capable than all of voldemort’s previously defeated plans combined.

    • Zement@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      If magic interferes and influences electricity, which means it can be measured, analyzed and manipulated as a new form of energy.

      To cover up magic on all “fronts” would be impossible by today’s standards. Harry Potter would never be as successful nower days as it was. Simply because the smartphone enters the life’s of humans as essential device very early in life.

      Kind of hard to switch off all those thoughts.

      • gramie@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Sounds like someone needs to read “Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality”.

      • nesc@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Easiest explanation is: there is no electricity in hogwarts and wizards don’t have electricians nor electricity generation, so “electricity doesn’t work in hogwarts”.

        If magic was electromagnetic or at least can be measured by effects that it has wizards would have been found during 20th century by general populace.

        • Zement@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          There are multiple mentions that electronics ALLWAYS malfunctions in presence of magic. So that is a new physical law in disguise. An especially interesting one that interacts with certain intelligence (like mind reading of the user, by the user of other users, memory extraction and manifestation in sentient beings).

          Sentient Electromagimagnetic field confirmed?

          • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Magic could operate differently from electromagnetism, but still interfere, such as with quantum effects. Inference doesn’t need to go both ways.

            I thought about writing a magic setting with fairly hard justification for magic, and in my world, you’d control individual atoms and combine them to get the effects you want. You’d do this by gaining the respect of or instilling fear into atoms so they’d do your bidding. Spoken spells are more like tricks taught to dogs than having any power of their own, and the power derives from the respect or fear the atoms have for the caster. This explains why some wizards/witches are more powerful than others, and why learning isn’t necessarily the best way to get more powerful. The strongest magic users in my world spend a lot of time meditating, meaning communing with the target group of atoms.

            The inner workings of atoms is poorly understood, so I think there’s room to insert some form of sentience.

        • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          The easiest explanation is that it’s magic and we’re all muggles and therefore incapable of understanding it.