The use of depleted uranium munitions has been fiercely debated, with opponents like the International Coalition to Ban Uranium Weapons saying there are dangerous health risks from ingesting or inhaling depleted uranium dust, including cancers and birth defects.

      • letsgocrazy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        51
        arrow-down
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        Being invaded is worse.

        The quickest way to save the most amount of lives is whatever gets rid rid of Russia the quickest.

        No question.

        Depleted Uranium is hardly dangerous.

        Another booby trapped mine with a grenade underneath gets placed by Russians every 4 minutes.

        Another Ukrainian citizen is tortured.

        And now there are reports of Ukrainian children being tortured.

        Bring on the napalm.

        • tryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          Depleted Uranium is dangerous for anyone exposed to it. It will be a persistant environmental pollutant that could render large areas unsuitable for agriculture. Downplaying the effects is stupid and dangerous.

          We need to talk about the effects and weigh the military benefit vs. the long term problems. Also for the military benefit you cannot take the shortcut of assuming no AP munitions to be used otherwise. Also the question is whether stronger AP abilities are needed, as Abrams should make quick work of T64s and probably T72s with normal AP rounds too.

          So we have to weigh a potentially marginal benefit with a significant long term health effect. I trust the Ukranian army and government to make that decision, but again the issues shouldn’t be downplayed. Because of downplaying and ignoring the issues with it there is thousands of American and British vets that suffer from diseases and birth defects in their children, struggling to get it recognised and properly compensated.

          • Gladaed@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Depleted uranium is not much different from lead. Heavy metals are unhealthy. It is barely radioactive as it is made from the rather stable uranium isotopes. (Hence depleted)

            • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Uranium is pretty toxic compared to lead. LD50 is roughly 114 mg/kg vs. 4665 mg/kg depending on source. If you happen to get that dust inside your body, the radiation isn’t going to help you stay healthy either.

        • mycorrhiza they/them@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          the “quickest way to save the most amount of lives” is peace talks. Both armies are locked in a stalemate and the war is going nowhere.

          • okamiueru@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            What is the point of peace talks with Russia? Promises and assurances by Russia have had no weight or effect. Which is why the war even happened. Also, Russia can end the war any day they want.

            • mycorrhiza they/them@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Russia started the war in the first place because — whether you think the fear is reasonable or not — Russia has loudly proclaimed for decades that they view NATO encirclement as an existential threat, and Ukraine joining NATO would massively expand NATO presence on the Russian border, leaving basically only Belarus as a buffer. And if Ukraine took Crimea with them while joining NATO, Russia would lose access to their only deep warm-water port on the black sea, Sevastapol, a port that is economically significant to them.

              • Bluetreefrog@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Maybe if Russia stopped invading their neighbors, then other neighbors wouldn’t feel the need to join NATO as protection from Russia.

  • Bloobish [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    94
    arrow-down
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ahh wonderful, time for so many future children to be born horribly disfigured via contaminated drinking water. Also don’t forget all the booming cancer rates!

  • CombatLiberalism [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    83
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    Every person involved in making this decision deserves to be buried in an unmarked grave with the weapons they love so much. How many innocent people completely uninvolved with the war are going to grow up suffering the effects of depleted uranium rounds? Another absolutely monstrous decision in a long line of monstrous decisions by the US government.

  • usernamesaredifficul [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    dropping a bunch of depleted uranium around seems a lot like the actions of a state that couldn’t give less of a shit about the wellbeing of the people living there

  • MonkCanatella@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    42
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    OP is known tankie just fyi. Doesn’t justify US or Ukrainian actions but make sure you understand that the reason for posting this isn’t out of any actual concern for human beings. They’re also peddling covid conspiracies

    • ThisMachineKillsFascists [he/him, she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      76
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      So let me get this straight, according to you:

      The people that don’t support either side of the war and want to end it as fast as possible through peace talks are evil tankies.

      And the bloodthirsty monsters that want to prolong a pointless war, arm Azov Nazis and kill as many people as possible with illegal inhumane weapons that scar generations are freedom-loving liberals.

      Seems like the tankies are the more reasonable ones in this situation.

      • barsoap@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        So you neither support the rapist nor the victim. How enlightened centrist of you.

      • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        want to end it as fast as possible through peace talks are evil tankies.

        Surrender == the end of Ukraine. There’s 0% chance of Russia honouring it for any meaningful length of time. They’ll see it as a weakness of Ukraine and they’ll just build up their forces again and attack. Any legitimate peace deal HAS to have the condition of Russia pulling out of all Ukrainian territory otherwise it’ll completely legitimise nations to start wars to take land for themselves. Russia loses nothing by withdrawing. And you 100% know this, which is why tankies keep peddling it - they can claim to be on the moral high ground by saying “we want peace! everyone else are bloodthirsty monsters!” but in reality they know it’ll just lead to more violence and genocide. Imagine calling the Allies blood thirsty monsters in WWII because they didn’t accept a peace deal with Nazi Germany because they wanted it to end as fast as possible.

        Nobody wants bloodshed. Ukraine didn’t ask for this war. But they’re not going to give up and let Russia get away with a land grab.

        Seems like the tankies are the more reasonable ones in this situation.

        If by reasonable that you want Russia to win this war then yeah, sure.

        • gnuhaut@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          otherwise it’ll completely legitimise nations to start wars to take land for themselves

          Have you been sleeping for the last decades? There were plenty of wars. The US didn’t stop them, in fact, the US started a bunch of them, and more were started by US allies, or waged with US help. The US supports illegal occupation (“taking land”) all over, too.

          So is there actually any norm anyone adheres to? Seems to me the actual norm is “don’t do anything the US doesn’t like”. It’s got nothing to do with starting wars or taking land.

        • ThisMachineKillsFascists [he/him, she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          This isn’t a children’s movie, there is no good guy in this war.

          No one fucking wins, if Azov ‘wins’ then Ukraine will become even more of a Nazi shithole and a husk of an economy as the US calls in all its debts. If Russia ‘wins’ then it won’t be much better off either.

          Nobody wants bloodshed. Ukraine didn’t ask for this war.

          Than advocate for peace talks instead of grinding more Ukrainians and Russians into paste, you bloodthirsty ghoul.

          But they’re not going to give up and let Russia get away with a land grab.

          See? You do want bloodshed. You care more about dirt than human life.

          There are only two outcomes of this war: A bloody long battle where innocent people get thrown in the meatgrinder regardless of which side comes out on top, or we get both sides to stop fighting and do peace talks so they can compromise and stop the killing as soon as possible. Nothing good will ever come out of this war. It needs to end as soon as possible to stop the bloodshed. The concern here should be stopping the loss of life as soon as possible, not caring about lines on a fucking map. For supposedly being pro-Ukraine, NATO sure loves killing Ukrainians.

      • Rubennaatje@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        The people that don’t support either side of the war

        They (and you) are clearly supporting Russia.

        • ThisMachineKillsFascists [he/him, she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          If we’re supporting capitalist Russia the same way NATO tools are supporting Nazi Ukraine then where are our comments saying we should send money and weapons to Russia to defeat the Ukrainian ‘orcs’, then? Show me where these pro-Russia comments are, I’ll wait.

          Get real, none of us have said anything in support of modern capitalist Russia. We’re communists ffs, would we really support the thing that killed the Soviet Union? Use your head.

          Next, you’ll tell me that people against the war on terror in the Middle East were on the side of the Taliban.

    • bouh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Info is reuters. Are you on a crusade against tankie? Because it looks like you are.

      • Kittenstix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s a pretty bad faith take, they’re just pointing out that op has an agenda as to why they are linking this specific article.

        • mycorrhiza they/them@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          op has an agenda as to why they are linking this specific article

          everyone has a fucking perspective, that’s a normal human behavior. do you expect people to just randomly select articles to post?

      • severien@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Something like Stalinist communists. Usually used for non-Russians, but for some reason they love Russian imperialism.

  • UlyssesT [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wine cave warrior NAFO ghouls are already doing Adults In The Room armchair calculations about how these death treats will increase chances of a profitable victory for their corporate masters by .03216% and how it’s a heroic sacrifice that disposable Ukrainians must make to defend the land for future profitability.

    maybe-later-honey 🍷 🍷 maybe-later-kiddo

  • bonus_crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Using depleted uranium rounds on your own territory seems bad. Especially since ukraine is a major exporter of grain.

    Then again , shooting a gun inside is stupid, until someone is breaking in and trying to kill you.

    • SmoothOperator@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      According to the article, studies in places where the ammunition has been used “indicated that the existence of depleted uranium residues dispersed in the environment does not pose a radiological hazard to the population of the affected regions.”

      What effect does it have on the grain?

        • Womble@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Ok, but the alternative is lead or tungsten, both of which are similarly toxic. So unless you are suggesting Ukraine only fights with artisanaly grown wooden weapons I’m not sure what point you’re making.

    • pizzazz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Does not compute. Why should depleted uranium have any effect on grain production. Its strong radioactive components are, as the name says, depleted. The only worry is inhalation immediately following impact.

      I think there’s way too much misinformation about this and way too many people talking without a clue

    • MonkderZweite@feddit.ch
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Then again, shooting a gun inside is stupid, until someone is breaking in and trying to kill you.

      Killing the opponent is the last resort in most developed countries.

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      If there’s one country to trust with nuclear safety it’s actually Ukraine. Capable engineers and scientists, understanding of institutional failure, and certainly not least memory of Chernobyl.

  • gnuhaut@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why though? Can’t imagine that these rounds are going to change the course of the war, so why? Are they out of non-Uranium ones?

          • letsgocrazy@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            “let” Ukrainians.

            Your patronising colonial mask is slipping.

            Ukrainians have ASKED for these weapons so they can get rid of the murderous, child torturing Russians out of their country.

            Stop amplifying the propaganda of child torturers.

          • invno1@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think Russia would be the most bloodthirsty if this was a contest. Good try though.

          • flying_monkies@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            14
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Imagine defending a regime that targets hospitals and schools for missile attacks and rains white phosphorous down on cities.

            If the Russians cared about anything beyond their own expansionist agenda, they’d retreat and end the war they started. If you actually cared about the suffering of Ukrainians, you would stop being a mouthpiece for that regime.

            • Łumało [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Fuck, I almost thought you were on about the US and Israel but guess not ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

              Too bad you still are pushing for the war to even continue. You don’t want the Russians to genocide every single Ukrainian so you still propose they should just do it themselves and continue running straight into landmines. 🙄

              How about some peace talks? Maybe? Oh wait Boris Johnson thought otherwise

    • Clarke @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because of the uranium bullets are denser and heavier than the lead bullets and you can use the uranium bullets on certain types of aircraft and other weapons systems to shred through medium to heavy armor that could not be penetrated with a lead bullet. TLDR this will be used as a force multiplier.

    • letsgocrazy@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      They are harder and penetrate armour better. So yes they will provide an advantage.

      The sooner Russian occupiers are no longer murdering Ukrainians and dropping mines over every square meter of land, the less harm comes to Ukrainians.

    • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Russian forced are mechanized and entrenched, depleted uranium self sharpens on impact, yielding far better armor penetration than previous technologies.

    • tryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      No individual measure aside from troops on the ground or nukes is going to change the course of the war by itself.

      The ammunition is very effective at punching through the armor. But the Ukrainians will be fucked when in 5 years Leukemia in children is skyrocketing

        • Łumało [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          So what, you’re suggesting that right now they are “winning”? By what metric are they “winning”? Western brownie points? Because all of the teenagers and young adults that are 6ft under would beg to differ.

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m sure Ukrainian soldiers on the front line are worried about cancer and birth defects.

    • flipht@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s not about them. It’s the children who find the spent ammo later.

      This crap is the reason that there are birth defects spikes anywhere the US military operates.

      • kitonthenet@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ok but the alternatives are not environmentally conscious either, finally the people who’s land it is should be the ones making choices about the conditions of that land

        • CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          The alternative bring tungsten? It’s very stable so anything besides eating a spent rod isn’t going to have effects. If it’s in the air it’ll just be inert. Even if it gets in your lungs it’ll be like any other dust. DU on the other hand would keep emitting radiation internally.

        • Square Singer@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          But which people? Government or the people who actually own the land?

          And I guess, their favourite choice of “Don’t use any weapons on my land and just clear off voluntairily” is not an option.

          I don’t get why people hate on the Ukraine for using weapons to defend themselves. Not like they chose to be attacked.

      • yetAnotherUser@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is ammo made from lead that much better? I honestly don’t know. Sure the radiation sucks but Uranium, at least the isotope they’re sending is “barely” radioactive. It’s the same Uranium people had in their plates etc. The toxicity is probably the far more relevant factor but I don’t know how Uranium compares to lead.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Depleted uranium is not really that radioactive. Everything is technically radioactive eventually though. Depleted uranium is what’s left behind when you seperate the radioactive stuff out. It’s a heavy metal still, so isn’t good for you, but heavy metals will always be involved. Trying to have a war using only healthy, organic, ethically sourced munitions isn’t going to happen.

      • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This makes sense.

        I imagine there’s a lot more reasons for birth defect spikes post US mil ops in addition to this. The military isn’t exactly an environmentally conscious operation. ☠️

        • flipht@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sure, burn pits and other crap will help.

          But this kind of ammo, kids will find and hang on to. They bring it home, add it to their collection of other cool shit they’ve scavenged…and then their brothers and sisters are born with malformed limbs, mishaped heads, etc.

          There have been a lot of stories written about it over the years. The one I read was specifically about Iraq I believe, but it was a while ago.

      • cooljacob204@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The amount of Ukrainians dying right now will pale in comparison to those effected by the munitions.

        The controversy around depleted uranium rounds is way overblown.

        Even in Iraq the evidence is super inconclusive. And yes birth defects rose however the entire country basically collapsed for years and nothing clearly indicates it was the DU used.

        Don’t get me wrong, it’s nasty stuff. But this is war, more people are getting killed by bombs then any DU related cancer can cause.

          • letsgocrazy@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            How do you you it’s not linked to any of the other hundreds of dangerous chemicals?

            • tryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Because the issue is specific to the region and started specifically after the tank battle where DU ammunition was used. If it would be a general issue with some dangerous chemical being used, we’d expect to see similiar issues in other regions. Of course it is hypotheticakky possible that at the same time some dangerous and persistant chemical exposure happened in the region, but that is not plausible and also the US would have a strong interest in finding such an alternative explanation. But there isn’t any research published, that provided an alternative.

              Also look into the wording of the US when sending the ammunition to Ukraine. They state that no radiation hazard is to be expected for the Ukrainians. They do not talk about a toxicological hazard.

          • mashbooq@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago
            1. correlation ≠ causation. 2) if the disease is caused by DU, is it due to the radioactivity or the fact that DU is a heavy metal?
            • tryptaminev 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇪🇺@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              i never said it had to be because of radiation. Even just in its effect as a heavy metal it seems to be much worse. Also it could be that it becomes airborn more easily than other metals such as lead, so the wreckage of tanks shot with DU are more dangerous to the people cleaning them up.

              • mashbooq@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                Why are you so worried about speculated harms when Ukrainians are actually being raped, tortured, and murdered by russians? Your lack of humanity is showing

      • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        We have to remember that Russia caused this war, however. So they also caused the depleted uranium being a possible health risk for future ukrainian children.

    • pelikan@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, Ukrainian soldiers on front line are worried about cancer and birth defects. They are rational human beings who hope to return to their homes and live long lives and grow healthy children, not some subhumans with only intent to kill, kill, kill, as you wish to think.

      • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I don’t know how rational this is. Given how many soldiers have died so far, if I were a Ukrainian sent to fight on the front line, I wouldn’t expect to be coming back. Rather I’d hope that I contribute to the defeat of the enemy, so that my children or my comrades children don’t grow up under Russian rule. I’m not in their shoes of course. There’s no universal motivation so maybe what you say is more prevalent. That said, this war might not end without soldiers doing a lot more killing so “kill, kill, kill” might be an appropriate viewpoint.

    • bouh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      You will get cancer sooner by staying in the sun on a beach or anywhere.

    • teddy_m@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Everyone should worry. Depleted uranium will contaminate large crop production areas and later these grains will be sold all around the world. Everybody will eat some.

        • teddy_m@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Depleted means that the radioactive isotope is lower in concentration. It still is somehow radioactive (it’s almost fine if not ingested) and still remains a heavy and toxic metal.

            • krolden@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              When they explode, they spread radioactive dust into the surrounding area. If that area is ever farmed it can contaminate the crops and cause cancer to anyone breathing in the dust

          • bouh@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Banana is somehow radioactive too you know. Or granit. Anciant Greece monument often are above the radiation levels allowed in a nuclear power plant.

            Also, while you talk about it, lead is far far more toxic than depleted uranium. Many metals are toxic actually, that’s why your government monitor water meant for consumption.

        • slice1@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Are you denser then Uranium? Why do you think there is an issue with waste from nuclear power plants? Hint: it is radioactive!

  • UraniumBlazer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh well… The amount of health risks that these rounds would cause would pale in comparison to the mines that the Orcs have planted everywhere. Anything to drive out the invaders!

  • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    41
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yet more confirmation that the West regards Ukrainians as subhuman, and that they know they’re not getting the territory back. Generations of birth defects, the unexploded bombs that cluster bombs leave behind, more and more people being drafted and shoved into a meat grinder in a war that’s already lost, just so some American ghouls can make a bit of extra cash off their Raytheon stocks.

    None of this was worth it. But it’s going to keep happening. The US will keep arming Nazis and pushing war over diplomacy and destabilizing everything until something is done to get rid of those bastard war profiteers and the ghouls who lied us into Iraq and Afghanistan.

    This shit’s so fucking stupid. Can’t wait for the chickenhawks to call me a bad person while sitting behind their keyboards demanding others be forced to fight in their stead.

    • spez@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yup, defence is definitely what they shouldn’t do. Russia is obviously doing God’s work here.

          • Łumało [he/him]@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ah yes, history started in 2022. Mind reminding me by whose sabotage caused the Soviet Union to be illegaly disbanded? Because guess what, this story starts in 1989 and context for many of it’s intricacies begins for a few cases even earlier. Including the Nazis of Ukraine and why they are so prominent in our (Hexbear and Lemmygrad) discussions.

            Geopolitics and conflicts aren’t defined by boots on the ground action, that is just an end stage and consequence of escalating actions done beforehand. So no, there is no NATO soldiers in the room with us right now. But there is plenty of high ranking officials, military and not, who have been cooking this proxy war for a while now and the consequence is Russian aggression and deaths of thousands.

            All of this could’ve been avoided. But you don’t care. You just want to be above them morally, as that’s all that matters for you. Being on the “good team”, like it’s sports.

            “Can you see those aggresive ruskies? Killing innocents without reason! At least we aren’t like them!”

            Ironic amd sadening.

  • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m just glad that as an Adult in the room, I’m on the right side of history. Arming Ukranian Nazis with depleted uranium is actually the least evil option and anyone who doesn’t understand that is a child.

    Another 50 billion for the cause!