• vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Suppose true, then we’ll reduce the use of “the whole Internet”.

    OK, we won’t, no tools yet.

    I really love Briar, except it’s functionally not quite there yet, and the desktop kind of such application synchronized with neighboring ships, so to say, with a delay-tolerant Web alternative, would be good. Over various links and media.

    Anyway, it’s not a technical problem, it’s a social problem. Not really different from ID checks on the streets and everywhere you go in the city, except much of the city got virtualized. And ID checks on the streets are automated by cameras everywhere and face recognition.

    Social problems are resolved in the legal, social, protest, civil war fields.

    • theherk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      57 minutes ago

      If that isn’t already shorthand for “whenever, wherever, whatever” it should be.

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    the simulatenous legislaiton from all countries seems very suspicious of a certain foreign adversary backing such motives. this isnt the first things like this happened. just a hunch.

  • Asidonhopo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    4 hours ago

    If this happens they should check ID at church too seeing as how children are much more likely to be abused or groomed by someone there.

  • melroy@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    172
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Hell no. Just use decentralized apps, fediverse etc. It’s not about “protecting” children. It’s about full control and power. So don’t give up.

    • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      decentralized apps, fediverse

      Those apps and / or the fediverse itself would get sued into the ground and shut down one app or server at a time. There’s nothing stopping any Governments authorities from going after servers inside their borders and there’s nothing stopping them from “harmonizing” identity verification restrictions among other countries. They’ve already done it once with Intellectual Property law.

      This push to de-anonymize the Internet isn’t new either. Microsoft started this back in the oughts with their Passport / Digital-ID program. Google and Meta, along with others, long ago launched their own versions and it’s why you can sign into so many websites with a Google or Facebook account.

      It’s generally referred to as IdP and now that the Internet has been fully corporatized, with minor holdouts, you can bet your bippy that the days of anonymous access are ending.

      • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        If only there was a non-commercial, decentralized way of doing the same thing we are already doing. Perhaps make it free too. Hmmm

        • krashmo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          What do you mean by that? Most of the infrastructure that makes up the internet is owned by like 6 companies.

            • krashmo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 hours ago

              So do a million different forms of encryption. That doesn’t make the infrastructure any less centralized. If the people who own the fiber decide to only allow pre-approved types of traffic to cross their networks then it doesn’t make any difference what sort of protocols exist. Building free cross-country or subsea fiber routes is not economically viable and the internet doesn’t exist without them.

                • krashmo@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  Please explain how you can bypass carrier enforced traffic shaping policy.

                  From geti2p.net:

                  I2P’s protocols are efficient on most platforms, including cell phones, and secure for most threat models. However, there are several areas which require further improvement to meet the needs of those facing powerful state-sponsored adversaries, and to meet the threats of continued cryptographic advances and ever-increasing computing power.

                  The people involved in the project you’re referring to acknowledge that governments can, by influencing carrier policy, disrupt and subvert the project’s intended function. Why then are you implying they are incorrect?

      • Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Last time I checked, the p!rate bay still exists. In fact there are many of them. Because the website itself is open source. The same could be done with any other site. If one gets taken down, two more pop up in it’s place.

    • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      It’s about the information vacuum. Now every service will get your ID or photo, giving them both age and a whole sort of other metrics to build a profile on you. And yes, Lemmy.ca doesn’t know that about me.

      • TheMonk@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I gotta be honest I thought I’d never be able to quit Reddit. But it was a lot easier when I just did it. If this shit becomes the norm, I’ll back out of a site first time they try that shit and block the site. Maybe I’ll just have to stop using the internet. Wouldn’t that be a net positive on my life. You made me do this, capitalism.

        • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          You made me do this, capitalism.

          This is a problem with Government not an economic system. It’s about control, not dollars, pounds, or yuan.

          • TheMonk@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            But this scene was set by capitalism. The family friendly, market friendly internet is the basis for this entire issue. Yeah, government is the one finally pulling the trigger on sanctioned, total control, but we’ve been surveilled and profiled and censored for decades at this point by countless corporations for ad dollars. We’ve gone through the cycles of outrage and acquiescence and outrage and acquiescence as things have gotten worse and worse—same goes for the quality of politician, all bought and paid for by telecom companies neutering everything we can do to make the market and internet more favorable while the politicians got worse and worse and we began accepting it and just laughing it off.

            And here we are. Don’t be fooled, this is 100% at the feet of capitalism.

          • planish@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Capitalism runs on top of government. Governments create and enforce the notion that a human, or a fictional human with fractional ownership (corporation), can in turn own arbitrarily large and important objects.

            This is often done at the behest of said arbitrarily-large-and-important-thing-owners, who also come up with other similarly terrible ideas to have the government do.

      • RightEdofer@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Sure but it would be trivial for a company to build profiles on people using public apps like Lemmy.

        • Pennomi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 hours ago

          But not necessarily link it to your other accounts or real identity, which is the point.

          • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            9 hours ago

            Unless you are one of the extreme privacy people, like deep into freakaziod territory, the folks who build tracking / id systems would maybe need an afternoon to go from your Lemmy username to your home address and underwear size.

            • Pennomi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              7 hours ago

              For my account sure. I use the same username most places. But it’s also reasonable to have a fairly decent Lemmy account that’s decoupled from all your other online accounts. Use a temp email provider, VPN, and proper browser and you’re most of the way there.

              • RightEdofer@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 hours ago

                There is a lot of information in the way you type and the topics you choose to discuss. More than we suspect.

  • BigTrout75@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    Can you have age verification and still be anonymous on the Internet? (Fixed fukted typo)

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Sounds like they’re asking about anonymous amicable anuities, and the answer is no, those are regulated by the SEC (or whatever investment governing body in your area), so you can’t legally buy an anuity anonymously, even if it’s amicable.

  • commander@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    We’re heading back to the dreams of the 90s with people running websites on non-standard ports and DNS (new rinky dink decentralized DNS?). Take a performance and usability hit for the return of a more decentralized Internet. Probably still more usable than the early internet with all the lessons learned and tools available to modern developers. We can also bring back the term: web master

    • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      10 hours ago

      There are already far more people in raw numbers on various federated/non-commercial/self-hosted/indie web stuff than there ever were on the early web- it just takes a little effort to find it.

  • TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    And as soon as that happens, I’m out. I’d rather just opt out of the modern internet. I already have to deal with my information getting leaked from various different services at least once every couple years it seems. I can change a credit card or a password, I can’t change my ID.

      • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Why do you assume that the old school forums are going to get exempted? They are going to get on the bus or get run over by it just like everywhere else. Government has already proven that they can, and will, regulate those forums.

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Car forums are still alive and well because they’re a great repository of knowledge. There are plenty of computing forums too still.

        • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Yep, and every one of them already complies with age verification laws so as new laws are added they’re going to comply with those as well. There are very few web admins / sysops / site operators out there who are willing, or even able, to buck these kinds of national laws.

      • PushButton@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I am already browsing the “old way”, since the mess with reddit…

        I found out there is a forum for everything. It’s not centralized in one website, but it’s not that different than browsing /r/whatever you know.

        More often than not, the discussions are more intelligent and on point too.

        For my doom-scrolling needs, Lemmy does the job.

        • phonics@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Lemmy will be pressured into age verification also and most hosts will crumble. $50M per caught infraction is wild.

          We gonna end up going back to libraries. Which actually would be cool as fuck. Like Yentl when all those dudes are hanging out in a big ass room talking philosophy. It’ll re-spark the postal service. Live music will thrive. Coz everyone will be like fuck the internet, we’ll do it live.

          • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Many fediverse hosts will make an effort to stay open by shifting their servers to countries that are out of reach of verification and law enforcement but that will only last so long.

      • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Let us know what you find. I’m ready to go back to the 90s/early 2000s internet. Golden era of the internet.

  • whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Google already changed logged out YouTube to a single row of recommendations and a button to login on roku and Android shield when it used to look like the logged in version just a couple weeks ago. Probably the kick I needed to get off, mostly just using it for a couple smaller call-in/debate streamers I can switch to a podcast or other version.

    • HarkMahlberg@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      logged out YouTube to a single row of recommendations and a button to login

      I got this update on my smart TV, and I don’t think Google realizes how much of an improvement it is. It’s unintentionally the best thing the app has ever done.

      Finally, no more fucking clickbait clutter all over the screen. I already just search for the channels I want to watch anyway. I love it.