Activist group Great Firewall Report spotted the outage, which it said disrupted all traffic to TCP port 443 – the standard port used for carrying HTTPS traffic.

“Between approximately 00:34 and 01:48 (Beijing Time, UTC+8) on August 20, 2025, the Great Firewall of China (GFW) exhibited anomalous behavior by unconditionally injecting forged TCP RST+ACK packets to disrupt all connections on TCP port 443,” the group wrote in a Wednesday post.

That disruption meant Chinese netizens couldn’t reach most websites hosted outside China, which is inconvenient. The incident also blocked other services that rely on port 443, which could be more problematic because many services need to communicate with servers or sources of information outside China for operational reasons. For example, Apple and Tesla use the port to connect to offshore servers that power some of their basic services.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Yeah they don’t understand this stuff. They don’t even know what a VPN is they’re just angry about it.

      Actually doing this would be devastating to the economy, and anyway they still need to justify their actions. They can’t be openly dictatorial just yet.

  • MourningDove@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    11 hours ago

    But… How else will the tankies receive their brainwashing?! Think of the poor propaganda being hurt by this madness!

  • comador @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    130
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    No wonder there were so few Chinese sourced hack attempts in my corporate F5 firewall logs last night lol.

  • r00ty@kbin.life
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    81
    ·
    1 day ago

    Just testing the big red button is still working. Nothing to see here, no I mean literally nothing to see here!

        • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          18 hours ago

          For example, in China the film industry censors LGBT-related films. Filmmakers must resort to finding funds from international investors such as the “Ford Foundations” and or produce through an independent film company.

          Good read. Fuck censorship. Fuck the CCP.

        • Nougat@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          31
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          24 hours ago

          Pro tip: Posting in non-relevant places about the controversy you personally find very important - even if you’re right - is counterproductive to the very thing you want changed.

          • SoupBrick@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            33
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            23 hours ago

            My friend, this post is about China getting cut off from the rest of the word, most likely due to government censorship.

            The title of this community is Technology.

            It is a PSA about the current steps the US is taking towards similar levels of censorship. This is pretty damn relevant to both the community and the post topic.

            I know some people don’t like it, but politics is part of tons of different communities. Even a crafting community would be affected by the current tariffs.

              • SoupBrick@pawb.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                23 hours ago

                Just as a reminder, you are able to block users if you do not like what they are posting.

                • BaroqueInMind@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  23 hours ago

                  Cool, but I hate living in an echo chamber, and worry remaining an ignorant dipshit like most people here, and I also don’t mind reading things that hurt my feelings. So, no.

                • Nougat@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  11
                  ·
                  23 hours ago

                  I don’t like to resort to that, but since you’ve suggested it - yeah, I’ll never hear about your concerns again. Thanks! Good job!

      • Psythik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        It’s not directly related to China, but it’s relevant to the topic at hand

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      21 hours ago

      HTTPS may be the official designation for the port, but it is the de facto standard port for TLS. Whatever you want to send over TLS, doesn’t really matter.

      HTTPS is just HTTP served over TLS (originally SSL).

      Step by step, if you were to analyze a web connection over port 443, you would see that the client first negotiates the TCP connection (via three-way handshake), then TLS, and it’s not till after TLS is established that HTTPS is negotiated.

      In that way, it’s kinda wrong to say it’s the HTTPS port. It’s really, nowadays, the TLS port. HTTP is just one of many protocols that can ride on top of it, and when we do that, we call it HTTPS.

    • Nougat@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      24 hours ago

      There’s lots of things that transport using HTTPS that aren’t websites in browsers.

      • mesa@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Yeah technically anything can run on any ports, we just like to default certain things.

        Ssh for example can work on port 2000 or whatever. Port knocking is fun too.

        • Nougat@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Oh, it’s not even that some other protocol is operating on 443. It’s that the underlying transport is HTTPS, just for something that’s not a website rendered in a browser by the client. Microsoft, for example, used RPC over HTTPS for Outlook connectivity to Exchange for a hot minute.

    • BaroqueInMind@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      23 hours ago

      VPNs, DNS over https (DoH), load balancers via DHCP, encrypted remote procedure calls, TCP pipes via gsocket.

      I could go on.

    • setsubyou@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Sometimes mandatory web proxies still allow direct connections to port 443 so as to not break https, which in return means as long as your connection is to port 443, that proxy will pass it through without interfering.

      I used to run sshd on port 443 for this reason back when I regularly had to work from client networks.

    • Zykino@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Pass thoses firewalls and other corporates proxy/VPN/… that block most ports. If what you build is at least partly used where user have internet access, you know this port is open. Even if 22, 8080 and all the others are closed.