I have a folder of MP3s, some of which date back to 1999, just a few years after the format was popularised. Most of them have utterly terrible names (think RIDEONAM.MP3). I think at this point they might even survive the heat death of the universe. And they’ll still be terribly-organised.

  • Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    I don’t really do the folder of MP3s thing any more.

    I am much more into the Jellyfin full of FLACs thing these days!

    I bet up in the attic next to one of my sweet old Abit motherboards I have a dusty old hard drive with a folder full of music from the 90s and early 2000s.

  • AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    That reminds me that I should definitely plug my phone into my desktop and do a ton of music folder creation and reorganizing. I’ve got over 500 files and I really need to fully organize every single one and reorganize the ones that are organized already. Same with my much smaller set on my desktop. Luckily that one isn’t nearly as bad.

    • uniquethrowagay@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      I have a few thousand mp3s and they are all neatly organised with tags and sorted in folders by artist and album. Whenever I add something i make sure it follows my naming scheme and has all the tags. Has been like that since I got my first few albums when I was like 10.

      Maybe I’m on the autism spectrum.

      • AceFuzzLord@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I have something similar on my laptop, but it’s only partially implemented on my desktop and phone. I only recently, within the last few years, really started to care. Some gear in my autistic brain started turning and now I need to have my music organized. I’ve just been held back on my phone and desktop because of how much work it would take, even though it would probably take less than an hour.

  • lichtmetzger@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    I find music on YouTube and autoconvert it to MP3 with yt-dlp and ffmpeg. It fetches new music from my personal “Favorite Music” playlist, downloads the highest quality audio source, converts it to MP3, embeds the metadata and cover art and tries to parse the artist and title as best as possible.

    yt-dlp -x -f bestaudio --audio-quality 0 --audio-format mp3 --embed-thumbnail --add-metadata --metadata-from-title "%(artist)s - %(title)s" --playlist-start 1 --playlist-end 999 https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=123abc -o "./files/%(artist)s - %(title)s.%(ext)s" --cookies-from-browser

    Needs minimal adjustment sometimes if the title format is weird, but works 95% automatic. What I like most about this is the fact that music vanishes all the time from YouTube, but it doesn’t affect me. No one deletes the files from my harddrive but me.

  • Quazatron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    You’ll find that MusicBrainz Picard is a heaven sent tool to properly tag your files, with optional proper renaming.

    It takes some getting used to, and I find it works best in whole albums, but produces a much more professional library.

    • darkreader2636@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Picard sometimes falls short on cover arts and track names of some niche or non-english albums because of that mp3tag with discogs is sometimes needed

    • ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      Oh I’ve been looking for something like this for a long time. I wonder how this integrates into something like Jellyfin if I want to host my own personal music streaming for myself.

      • AnExerciseInFalling@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 days ago

        In addition to autorenaming Picard can also auto organize into folders. So any time I buy new music, I run it through Picard to ensure metadata is correct, grab lyrics, and put it in the right folder that is then picked up by my self hosted navidrome

        • DarkSirrush@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 days ago

          Picard is literally the only Jellyfin related tool I use that isn’t fully automated, because somehow the automated versions I could find were doing things like renaming files on a 60% confidence of the filename and I had to nuke and re download my library.

          So instead I open Picard, click 6 whole buttons, and my entire library/new files are renamed, tagged, and sorted 100% accurately.

      • Quazatron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 days ago

        I use Jellyfin also.

        My workflow is like this: buy CDs from Discogs, rip them to FLAC, adjust filenames, covers and metadata with Picard, push the files to Jellyfin that promptly detects the new files.

        I also use Soundconverter in Linux to generate MP3s files for devices that don’t support FLAC.

        I’m very happy with this setup and my collection has never been so organized.

  • BoxOfFeet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I actually got rid of all my old MP3s years ago. Not because I regret acquiring them, but because the quality sucked. Even 320kbps. You can’t tell CD from MP3 through my stereo, or in the car. But it is really obvious through my headphones, and ruins my critical listening experience. Had to re-rip all of my CDs to lossless, and lost all the ones I didn’t have CDs for.

  • dinckel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    4 days ago

    We’ve evolved towards a software-managed autotagged library of lossless audio now, but yeah, pretty much.

    I just had a chat with my friends about how the family plan price went up 30% while the basic functionality doesnt fucking work half the time

    • Lonewolfmcquade@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Amen. Glad to hear I’m not the only one baffled that Spotify’s app development is total garbage. It is one app that doesn’t get updated ever - once I have a working version. If it were up to me, I’d happily never use it again

  • ar99644@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’ve been sorting my MP3 files since 2003. It’s a Sisyphian task. Every few years I’m like “ok, let’s sort those songs with the new, improved sorting method I just came up with” and after a few hours or days of intense sorting I just quit and let them be.

    Maybe this will be the year I finally sort them out! 🤣

  • SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 days ago

    I still use mp3s because:

    1. No financial cost
    2. Not tied to any one app or service
    3. More customization: Can be played back at any speed or modified in some other way
    • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      no fucking commercials or streaming bullshit.

      ZERO FUCKING DOLLARS GOES TO JOE FUCKHEAD ROGAN.

      that’s enough justification for mp3 imho

  • abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    4 days ago

    left spotify and started downloading all my music from [COMPLETELY LEGAL AVENUES] and bandcamp. It’s good to have music that Spotify cannot take away from me.

    • tired_n_bored@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 days ago

      I download music from YouTube. Are the “completely legal avenues” better than that? In that case can you provide links in DM so I make sure to block these domains and to promptly inform the authorities? Thank you.

    • kadu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      I have a happy middle ground:

      I pay for Tidal’s student subscription. I leverage the fact Tidal streams FLAC files that can be decrypted by your account to build my local collection.

      So I never actually stream or use their app, but technically am paying for the downloads.

      I tried buying FLACs from companies that actually wanted to sell FLACs but they have ridiculously bad catalogues.

        • kadu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Yep, they’re regular FLAC files with tagged metadata.

          You can use them as normal. Copy to another device, to an iPod, use them on a video editor, send to a friend.

          This has been going on for ages, Tidal never patched it, so I think they quietly are okay with it because not many users do it anyway and at least you’re paying for the service.

        • kadu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          I think any links would violate Lemmy.world’s policies.

          But a quick search for “Tidal downloader github” will give you several options.

          But the ides is that when Tidal streams to specific devices they basically upload an encrypted FLAC to an AWS host and the device downloads the file and uses your account as the key.

          So people create apps that do all that, but instead of simply streaming the FLAC, they download and save it. They require a paid account, or an active free trial. I pay for the discounted student one, which still gives you access to the maximum audio quality.

          The great part is you get album art, live lyrics, high resolution audio, an organized and properly tagged library with zero work. The output FLACs are regular files - no DRM or weirdness, I use them on a MP3 player.

          • SidewaysHighways@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            i gave it a cursory duckduckgo! everything looked a couple years old. I’ll keep digging.

            i wouldn’t mind a dm! if you’ve the time.

            • kadu@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 days ago

              You want a new generation tidal downloader.

              On GitHub.

              So a Tidal downloader new generation.

              One could call such a thing tidal-dl-ng if they’re trying to save some letters, I guess.

  • Noxy@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    4 days ago

    hey now, they’re flac files and painstakingly sorted with the help of musicbrainz picard

      • Noxy@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 days ago

        I also have that one folder of random shit that I’ve avoided sorting for the last 20 years.

        pff I have so many folders like that that I have folders for those kinds of folders. I should probably put those folders all into a single folder…

        • Wolf314159@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 days ago

          It’ll destroy all your painstakingly crafted and curated ID3 tags much faster than Picard. I’m not salty or anything. Anyway, the lesson for me was that music is simply too complicated from a library perspective to trust to highly-automated tools like beets. Picard kind of encourages you to go directory by directory and release by release, and that is a good thing. These days so are does most of the library stuff for newly added things, but I usually end up fixing it all basic to my standard with Picard later.

          • Noxy@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            Yeah, definitely agreed. There are so many edge cases. I tend to put new downloads/purchases in an “intake” dir and then run that through picard, which then saves it at the final local storage path with whatever tags I decide to use

  • Apocalypteroid@lemmy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m old enough to be one of Napster’s early adopters. Unfortunately most of my collection has been lost to either malfunction or negligence but due to most of the major streamers being fucking evil I’m back sailing the musical seven seas. And plus my internet is about 100x faster now so yohoho mehearties.

    • cujo255@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I was dipping my toes back in the seas earlier today, but did not find a good option, is there one you like for music other than rutracker which appears very sketch and needs an account?

      • Apocalypteroid@lemmy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Unfortunately, the fish aren’t as plentyful as they were back in the good ol’ days but I’m still finding most of what I want on pirate bay or 1337X. It’s just a case of finding the option with the most reliable seeds.

      • tehn00bi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Aren’t private trackers the best method? But good luck getting an invite to them.

        Side note, if someone has connections, I’m interested.

  • Moonrise2473@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    That can be fixed easily* with programs like beets

    * = the program itself is easy to use, but installing and configuring it, requires a PhD in Linux-Arch-ology___

    • wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      4 days ago

      No I’m sure there will be an obscure shell script that someone wrote to do all of the install for you that will suddenly fail on a broken python dependency (because why not) and then leave your system in semi-altered state that doesnt really work wrong but its never quite right again

      • r_13@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        4 days ago

        I 100% learnt to use docker specifically to avoid the exact situation you described.

        • Hawke@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 days ago

          Got any good resources for learning?

          In my (limited) experience Docker is just “run some script from a random GitHub that loads more stuff from a random GitHub… now you have a blob of code on your PC somewhere that’s unmodifiable and inaccessible unless it’s a web app in which case it’s listening on a random port with no access to any system resources”

          I assume there’s something more I need to be doing but all the learning resources just kinda assume you understood wtf it’s doing.

            • Hawke@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 days ago

              I mean I’d rather get told to “rtfm” than hear “it just works” with no explanation

          • r_13@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 days ago

            I tend to think of docker containers like light virtual machines.

            You can start with an image of a very simple bare operating system, or from an OS with a few things installed (in my case I have lately been using images from dockerhub under nvidia/cuda-ubuntu so that my container spins up with ubuntu and the drivers and SDK for my GPU).

            Then essentially the Dockerfile becomes the sandbox from which to test installation scripts, see what works by trial and error if necessary, to install the programs you want – if you make a mistake or the install script fails as in the comment above, you can just kill the container and spin up a new one without the “doesn’t really work wrong but its never quite right again” issue :)

            I know this does sound like ‘rtfm’ but I definitely have made a lot of use of the Docker manuals: https://docs.docker.com/manuals/

            These manuals, plus stack overflow searching for Dockerfile tips, and github repos for the software I want to use that sometimes do contain Dockerfiles, have been enough to get me acquainted with spinning up my own containers and installing what I need, and use docker compose to run multiple containers on a single host that can talk to each other. Beyond that, I had to search a bit harder (mostly on StackOverflow, but also a bit of tail-chasing using ChatGPT) to learn how to configure overlay networks to allow containers to talk to one another from on different servers, and using docker stack to spin up a swarm of containers as services on a cluster.

            • Hawke@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              Yeah… that all makes sense and those docks seem decent. The piece of the puzzle that’s missing for me is: how does docker turn a yaml config that says like … (from their example):

              > frontend:
              >     image: example/webapp
              >     ports:
              >       - "443:8043"
              >     networks:
              >       - front-tier
              >       - back-tier
              >     configs:
              >       - httpd-config
              >     secrets:
              >       - server-certificate
              

              … into actual operating, functioning container blobs? e.g. How does it know that “secrets: server-certificate means that it should take an ssl cert and place it in the container? How does it know where to place that certificate?

    • Hawke@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 days ago

      Musicbrainz Picard is a lot easier than beets, although it does require some introductory concepts to make sense (e.g. terminology like “release”, “release group”). And it makes it too easy to accidentally poison datasets in an attempt to be helpful. Harder to automate than beets, too.

      Both of them also benefit from a decent knowledge of where your files came from, not as good for a random pile of mp3s.

    • littleomid@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I used MusicBrainz Picard when I stopped paying for Spotify. Went over my old library, audio tag matched all my songs, added all metadata, sorted everything. I moved it to Nextcloud and using the Music Player plugin, I have my own Spotify using any supersonic/ampache client. Life is good.

        • pticrix@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 days ago

          I use Symfonium and an easily happy with it, if it helps. Not foss - you have a one time fee (aka buying - not a subscription), however. I found it worth it, and use it in conjunction with a Navidrome instance.

          • funkajunk@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 days ago

            I’ve been using Tempo with Navidrome and it’s really good!

            +1 for Feishin if you want a desktop client as well.