• entwine@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 minutes ago

    Why can’t they just intercept the boats and arrest the people on board if they truly have evidence of smuggling? It’s cheaper in the short term than wasting expensive missiles, and much cheaper in the long term when you factor in the reparations we’re going to have to pay to the families of all the people that were murdered.

  • Sektor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    It’s like the Apocalypse Now scene, without the part when they try to search the boat.

    • orbitz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      25 minutes ago

      Besides that it’s from the administration that lies all the time, and no proof has been shown? I guess not, though there are good arguments that the boats couldn’t have reached the US and having 11 people on a smuggling boat doesn’t make sense.

      Then there’s the fact that the crimal punishment for smuggling isn’t death and they were not even charged, had a trial and found guilty.

    • Tiresia@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Presumption of innocence.

      Also, a long history of the US government engaging in fraud and slander as an excuse to start wars, from the USS Maine to the Gulf of Tonkin incident to the WMDs in Iraq.

  • MrSulu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    Extrajudicial murders using the same paltry level of evidence as most ICE operations. The word MURDER is the essential word.

    • INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      12 hours ago

      It pains me to give trump the benifit of doubt greatly but I’d love to see some solid evidence of it not being drug smugglers so we can nail him the fuck down for it in the future.

      • entwine@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 minutes ago

        Everyone already explained why your view on this issue is misguided, so I’ll just add one thing: even if these people are guilty of drug smuggling, that is not a crime that’s punishable by death in the United States.

      • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Besides the fact that evidence doesn’t work that way, the Administration has options here if they actually believed those were drug boats. The 50BMG rifle exists to put a big hole in an engine block. There are snipers good enough to make that shot at a few hundred yards in a helicopter.

        They choose to use a much more expensive missile that just so happens to obliterate any evidence.

        They’re just killing random fishers.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        A lack of evidence of innocence isn’t the same thing as evidence of guilt.

        Even if they were guilty of smuggling drugs, using missiles to murder them is excessive force.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Yeah that’s not how evidence works. The onus is on him to provide evidence that they are drug boats, which should be trivial for the largest military in the world.

        Why would you ever give him the benefit of the doubt here?

      • Jhex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 hours ago

        It pains me to give trump the benifit of doubt greatly

        then don’t?

        but I’d love to see some solid evidence of it not being drug smugglers

        it’s pretty hard to get evidence from an exploded small boat, sunk in the ocean… not counting that proving negatives is fairly hard (which is why that’s not how evidence works)… how do you “prove” to me you are not a drug smuggler?

      • MrSulu@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Completely agree. I think that they’d be waving it about if they did.

  • Bwaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    20 hours ago

    They can tell how many they killed, but no actual eviidence of drugs in the wreckage while counting bodies??

    • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      19 hours ago

      That’s the neat part! They can’t! No one is counting bodies in person, this is all remote us murder, as is tradition.

        • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Same way they knew about enemy casualties in any conflict, they “estimate” from observed data before they pull the trigger.

          FYI did you know that the us claimed 1.1 million kills in Vietnam? The Vietnamese claim less then 500,000 where killed (with many many more civilians killed)

  • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    It’s insane that they aren’t, at worst, intercepting and searching these vessels. As with everything Trump does, cruelty is the point.

    This man is a convicted felon that is sloppily trying to cover up the fact he sexually abused children (Epstein Files), along with the full support of the republican party. And the GOP (politicians and voters alike) are complicit with these crimes as long as they agree he should not be punished.

    We, the sane people in this world, will never forget these facts.

    • M137@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Yeah, but that is the case for a LOT of murder done by both states and individuals. I’m in no way saying that to lessen how bad it is, if anything it should give people pause to reflect on how bad many things they don’t see as bad are.

  • Njos2SQEZtPVRhH@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    Not recognizing ICC, regime change, illegal killing of foreign civilians, supporting genocidal regimes, invading other countries, carpet bombing nations, incarcerating their own population, killing eachother in mass shootings, biggest per capita contribution to climate change.

    American exceptionalism isn’t doing us any good.

    But ooh nooo China, please Europe, fear China… We are your ‘allies’.

  • Furbag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 day ago

    If they claim they know that these boats have drugs on them, they could just apprehend them when they made port.

    But then they would have to actually find said drugs to use as evidence to prosecute them.

    This is just extrajudicial murder, plain and simple. I hope Trump and everyone who is involved with this dies an excruciatingly painful death.

    • x00z@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      But then they would have to actually find said drugs to use as evidence to prosecute them.

      It’s not like those can’t be planted. They’re already killing civilians of another country, there’s no bottom in their games.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      If they claim they know that these boats have drugs on them, they could just apprehend them when they made port

      That would require due process, instead of a spectacle of Shock and Awe.

      Also, let’s say, hypothetically that these aren’t drug boats. Let’s say they are boats moving medical supplies or fuel or building materials between Venezuela and Cuba. Let’s say they’re actually military units working on behalf of the Venezuelan Coast Guard or just fisherman who got caught in an international crossfire.

      It’s just easier to say “Drug Gang. Killed them.” knowing no major American media source is going to publish a rebuttal. Nobody in the US has access to the details of the attack. Nobody is going to interview the families or investigate the wreckage. Nobody is going to contradict this regime when it comes to butchering citizens of the Global South.

      So why not call them a drug gang? Call them human traffickers. Call them roving nautical pedophiles. Call them Islamic Jihad.

      American audiences won’t hear anything different.