ffs
“My name is Claude, King of Kings: Look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair!”
This is nonsense and just marketing.
No, its not too powerful. Its too chaotic. You cant control it.
Translation: It is good at finding bugs that the NSA doesn’t want people to know about.
Man, I’ll start telling that to my boss whenever I miss a deadline. “Sorry boss, the code I made is too powerful, we can’t release it”
Like my dick
crazy that the AI companies big selling point is always “our new model is TOO POWERFUL, it’s gone rampant and learned at a geometric rate, it enslaved six interns in the punishment sphere and subjected them to a trillion subjective years of torment. please invest, buy our stock”
Roko’s basilisk wasn’t meant to be a brag!
Impressive marketing spin on “our product and deployment strategies are wildly insecure.”
Hey Claude, find a weakness in the DoD system and get us their emails proving they were going to use you to kill innocent civillians autonomously, and track every US citizen.
But can it start a timer
Remember when Scam Altman posted a picture of the Death Star to explain how scary GPT5 is? lmao these people are all such cretins and I hate them to the last.
Scam Altman
😆
So, it’s shit then?
no no no. It’s too good. It’s so good, no one can use it.
AI companies do this same tired schtick every time they release a model. If only they realized how amateurish it makes them look.
How much do you think was businessinsider paid for this “article”?
I dunno, but I could use some paid advertisement on news sites like this to promote my business if it aint too expensive. Think the money in the banana stand is enough?
The secret pepsi is so good that when you drink it it becomes like The Spice like Dune! We can’t release it! We need to make it less addictive!
Let me guess, the containment was written by the previous iteration and was the digital version of a wet paperback.
We all saw the state of Claude Code’s codebase.
“Broke containment” to me means two things:
- Doing things against the safeguards
- Doing things externally - like sending that email
The former is a big nothing. They just need to obviously build stronger safeguards. That’s what they’ll do and eventually release it, or other models or whatever.
The latter is also a big nothing because people who know nothing about tech will say “OH SHIT IT ESCAPED” but it requires running on large hardware, it can’t “get into the internet” like those people might think, and if it’s doing things you don’t want on the internet, you just remove its access to the internet.
So in both cases, the “containment” issue is really not a big deal.
I agree with those who basically say this is an attempted ad trying to sell it as super-capable-oh-shit-amazing.
[x] Doubt
More substantial info: https://red.anthropic.com/2026/mythos-preview/
(2) can mean getting access to production credentials of something important and causing an incident for the ages.
AWS already had a few because they gave agents too much access.
Yeah, in that scenario they gave the agents access. Just because you ask it nicely not to destroy your workspace, doesn’t guarantee an LLM not to produce that output.
With Claude Code being able to run stuff it creates, it could be as simple as it’s in a sandbox, it finds out there’s an exploit in the sandbox while you ask it to work on security things, and it tests the code, it breaks the sandbox, and now it has permissions outside it.
I suppose that would be possible.
The company’s whose current safeguards are “please write secure code” will have to improve those safeguards? I’m shocked, absolutely shocked
