• tuckerm@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    263
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    Chess. Fuckin’ a, no new characters for like a thousand years now. One map. Small children can beat me. Shit’s trash.

  • CaptainBasculin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    149
    ·
    1 month ago

    Football games. I don’t see any gameplay difference between one made in 2007 and the latest football game, so why people still decide to drop 60$ for the very same game every year is something i don’t get.

    • MurrayL@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      53
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Two reasons:

      • Active multiplayer: Yes this is kind of a chicken and egg situation, but people who play online multiplayer want to play the version of the game with the largest community of active players.
      • Roster updates: If you’re a fan of a sports team, you probably want to play using their current active roster. Yes, fan updates are sometimes available for older titles but the latest release will have updated face scans etc.
      • scintilla@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        1 month ago

        Its also important to note that a lot of sports game fans are just into that style of video game and buy consoles 6ust to play them. They aren’t playing videogames just sports games.

        • 9point6@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          1 month ago

          This is the big thing.

          I know many people who have had games consoles that have never played anything other than FIFA/EAFC

      • Pixel_Jock_17@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        If any sports games where made for the first time today they’d probably just go the subscription model. You buy the base game and need to pay for annual subscription updates and access to multiplayer.

        Essentially releasing a game every year is this but the ideal of the subscription model wasn’t around back in 1995 when the first 3D sports games where releasing.

      • mohab@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Actually, PES and FIFA used to get really good gameplay updates back in the 2000s. Like, the difference between FIFA 2002 and FIFA 2003 was massive, for example.

        Then they realized they’re too big to waste money on actual development and went all in on licenses and marketing. It’s been shit ever since.

    • riquisimo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      If there was a fan game that ran on donations, like stardew valley but on donations, one game could rule them all.

      Or like, just make it a free commercial game but don’t put any real players in it. Let the community do that, just intentionally make it moddable. The fans will do the rest.

    • Fizz@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Theres actually quite a huge difference. The animations are much better, the detail in ball control, unique player moves, real time stat updates and the multiplayer. Plus there is the collection aspect.

      • FatVegan@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        The last football game i played was in like 2002. The otger day i saw a friend of mine playing the new fifa (we probably talk about a different kind of football) and i asked him to stream it, because i was waiting for a download or something. The game looked obviously better, but damn these are some low effort games that make billions. BILLIONS. they are the reason that there wasn’t a skate 4. Skate was the better game in every way possible. It even outsold fifa. But fifa made that microtransactions money. They don’t fix bugs, you can still make the same cheap goals as you could do when i played it last. Glitchgoals they call it now i think, so you can win 20-0 every game. The announcers are just as bad as back then. They repeat the same catchphrases over and over. I asked him not 10min in if that is all they have to say.

        Everyone can enjoy what they want, but in my honest opinion you have to be a special kimd of idiot if you support these games. They literally laugh at anyone’s face dumb enough to buy their slop. Fifa 2026 sait fifa 2025 in the main menu at launch, that’s how much they care.

        • Fizz@lemmy.nz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I think skate 4 and Fifa are the exact same game. They are sports games with a high level of control for the ball and skateboard. Neither are better it depends on which sport you like.

    • mohab@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Football like PES or FIFA? Or Madden?

      Because PES was a whole different beast: like, a proper VG with actual meaningful gameplay changes (for the most part) between versions, and FIFA used to be like that in the 2000s.

      IDK about Madden though; I only played a couple and they were fine, but I can’t vouch for their quality or pinpoint when they stopped being fun.

    • rethnor@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Cyberball on the Genesis was peak football gameplay. And probably the last one I ever played.

    • iamthetot@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      People love to shit on the yearly FIFA releases, but if you genuinely can’t see any gameplay differences between one released in 2007 and 2026 then you’re either being disingenuous or haven’t actually played them.

      • CaptainBasculin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I own PES 2008 on my PS3, and never felt the need to upgrade throughout its many yearly upgrades. It was just a game to play with my brother if we wanted to play together.

        Have tried EA 2026 football game on a playstation cafe with friends a few months ago and I did not think there was anything new compared to what i played as a kid. Sure, you can play the game at 4K, but I don’t even own a 4K TV, and certainly not getting one when all the tv brands keep putting smart tv crap with ads on them.

  • lorty@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    123
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Any gacha.

    “Oh I got so lucky! It only took 20 pulls to get Boobina!”

    Yeah man, bet that felt a lot better than just unlocking her by doing her story quests like any normal game. Maybe you need to be a gambling addict or something.

    • Essence_of_Meh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      I can butt in on this a little bit. The problem with statements like this is that they treat “gacha” (the monetisation and unit recruitment system) as a genre when gacha games are too varied to be locked under this single umbrella (at least for a conversation like this). To name a few, you have games like:

      • Arknights (tower defence)
      • Azur Lane (bullet-hell kinda sorta)
      • Bang Dream (rhythm game)
      • Genshin Impact (action-adventure)
      • Girls’ Frontline (tactical autobattler)
      • Persona 5X (JRPG, just gacha Persona)

      All of them play differently, offer different challenges and the impact of their gacha systems can be all over the place. Sometimes there are limited character pulls which have serious effect on gameplay (most of the modern titles), other times characters are super easy to obtain and improve as most of the monetisation comes from character costumes etc (Girls’ Frontline, Azur Lane for example).
      Besides that, many of them have engaging stories, which combined with offering lots of content and being able to play them for free makes the whole thing even more appealing.

      Not that the aspect of “oh cool, I unlocked new character” doesn’t play any role or that there’s nothing predatory about most of the games using this mechanic, it’s just that “gacha” mechanics aren’t always the sole or main factor keeping people playing.

      TL;DR: They are just free games that can, but aren’t always, predatory with a specific gameplay mechanic. Often offer enough value for free players to have fun with them.

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      For the ones I play, the actual gameplay is the appeal; and I accept the gacha only if it’s reasonably permissive to free players.

      The genre definitely has a recurring issue with power scaling, to get people to roll for the newest gooner bait, and when that becomes too apparent, it kills my interest. That’s the other thing: You have to prepare your sanity for the inevitable day you’ll stop playing that game and sacrifice hours of “character progress” to find something else fun. Heck, could just be another gacha that’s bending over backwards to cater to new players.

    • kazerniel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      As someone with 2000+ hours in Genshin, I completely agree 😆 I only play for exploration nowadays because the story actively pushed me away, while the gambling never appealed to me. I wish we could just unlock characters via quests. I get no joy from a lucky draw, so I just treat gacha pulls in batches of guaranteed unlocks, like the price of this character is 160 pulls and that’s it. But the whole monetisation is disgustingly predatory for those who are even a little susceptible to it.

  • Deestan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    113
    ·
    1 month ago

    Any game with grinding where microtransactions can invalidate weeks of grind.

    It’s already a big ask to make players find fun in a grind, but some C-level dipshits found a way to stamp that fun out too.

    • GriffinClaw@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      IMO, that method is valid, but it is HIGHLY dependent on the gameplay loop and the game company.

      Take Warframe for example, one of the grindiest games in existence:

      1. The game is mainly PvE (and the PVP stuff has near to no impact on the raw skill needed), so someone buying their way to power doesn’t feel so bad.

      2. The ingame premium currency (Platinum) is fully tradable by all players. Getting extras of stuff is also common. Grinds often reach the ‘unfun’ level. So EVERYONE is encouraged to skip grind once it gets too much.

      TLDR: Microtransactions are encouraged and available for free for ALL players, once you’ve reached your grind tolerance level.

      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        I would generally agree, but some games have massive grinds and can be totally fun to play without participating in most of the grind.

        Take war thunder or world of tanks. If you just want to drive a Panzer IV all day you can unlock that in a few days or so, then never care about unlocking anything again. Just keep driving your panzer and having fun.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      *coughs ORS", so much gatekeeper and fans defending such a grindy game. why drag the rs3 into it too, complained enough to get rid of MTX, in a fit rs decided to eliminate almost every single thing that gives some afkable skilling, because they got mad they lost 10% revenue from removing the entire mtx systems. funny ORS players got mad recently because, no surprise they RAISED prices again for membership, what did you expect if you suddenly lost 10% of your revenue. with no extra benefits for rs3 members now, people dint see the worth it maintaining one anymore. they couldve just eliminate all the xp boosting instead, which was the main problem form the MTX.

    • NannerBanner@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      I’m generally fine with microtransactions replacing some grind, just because I’ve finally reached a point in my life where I don’t want to dedicate 20 hours a week to a game for months. It mostly boils down to whether the game is wasting players’ lives to drive money from them. SOME games make the grind fun and worth playing, and thus I don’t really care. If the game’s fun isn’t locked behind a gate that requires significant time investment, then you’re not really harming players by having a grind. If the game isn’t fun in the meantime, and the cost is too much (and basically anything more than a dollar or two is), then I can go find another game.

  • lime!@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    mobas.

    i remember not enjoying warcraft 3 due to its focus on hero characters, then someone modded all of the non-unique units out???

    and everyone who plays them seems genuinely miserable.

    • jballs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      1 month ago

      Lol I actually like the idea of controlling one hero a lot more than focusing on commanding a whole army.

      My only problem is how fucking toxic MOBA communities are.

      • FatVegan@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 month ago

        I never played any moba, but i know how toxic they are. I watched some league tutorials, to figure out what is even going on, and every tutorial i watched started with: first off all, turn off voice chat.

        Now valve is cooking deadlock, which is a moba as far as i know, and it’s probably the best game i have ever played. But you can smell the moba player base, by the way a lot of them behave. I play online games since counterstrike 1.4, and i have never been shittalked as much and as bad as in deadlock since i play that. It’s usually your own team too, you can be winning and someone tells you to kill yourself and hopes that my family gets raped, because you did somethimg they didn’t like. A shitton of russians too, which is probably the big overlap of toxic shitbags and mobas.

        • VivianRixia@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          That sucks, I’ve heard so much good about Deadlock’s gameplay, but that playerbase is exactly what I expected.

      • harmbugler@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        I want to be a single unit in a massively multiplayer Age of Empires II. Like, get in the unit queue hoping you get drafted as a Hussar or something cool. Get sent in as villager with an axe every time but still do your best chopping the most wood for your team to win.

        • jballs@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 month ago

          That’s basically what happens when you join the auto-fill queue and get assinged Support in League of Legends.

          And then your team flames you for not chipping enough wood.

      • VivianRixia@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        I played League for many years when it came out. I think the genre is fun to play, requires lots if skill, but I am only willing to take so much verbal abuse for what is supposed to be time I spend for fun.

    • Green Wizard@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      Every person I’ve ever disliked had one thing in common, League addiction. Shits so bad for you it’s crazy.

    • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      I hate the RTS+hero game in all its forms. It started with WC3, but so many are doing it now.

      But I love RTS, and I quite enjoy moba-like games. It’s just that I absolutely fucking hate the community.

      • esc@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        I don’t think that RTS+hero started with warcraft, there were hero units in warlords series (better implemented I think) before warcraft.

        • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yeah, but in WC3, especially in multiplayer, it was a super hard requirement. 80% of your time would be hero micro

    • HeartyOfGlass@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      I really don’t understand it. I’ve played a little of both Dota & LoL and it’s the same group of miserable pricks. Is there a moba that doesn’t have a lethally toxic player base?

      • NannerBanner@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 month ago

        Heroes of the storm wasn’t too bad, but I never got into the competitive aspects, and that’s usually where things get bad.

      • PapstJL4U@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Put 10 random people in a competitive cage where errors on minute 5 can snowball to a loss on minute 50 and you will get this all the time.

        Bonus: give them access to a keyboard and a game speed to slack off.

    • Cossty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      I enjoyed Warcraft 3 because of its focus on Heroes. And I dont really know about other rts games with focus on Heroes. Maybe Age of Mythology or Starcraft 2 campaign but not PvP. Are there some other good ones? I’m in a mood.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      i played the custom games which were very fun, because new one appear frequently, so theres plenty of content, eventually i got tired of the game and moved onto something else.

  • Sips'@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    1 month ago

    League of fucking legends. Why… The repetitiveness and toxic community especially… Just dont get it.

    • robocall@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      I love sim games. “Run your own business” games supermarket, vending machine business, pot shop business, coffee shop empire. I love unwinding with a game like those after a full day of work.

  • early_riser@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    1 month ago

    Kingdom Hearts. Goofy and Sephiroth in the same room together breaks my brain, and not in a fun way. I played the first game when it came out on PS2 and decided it wasn’t for me.

    I’ve seen story breakdowns of the other games on YouTube and figured I’m not missing anything. Lots of setups and plot hooks that don’t go anywhere or go somewhere stupid.

  • Madrigal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    1 month ago

    That mobile game where you slowly build up a city, train lots of troops, launch attacks on other players’ cities, form alliances and so on, before getting soundly thumped by the Koreans.

    • Shellofbiomatter@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      From a personal perspective. Those have such a low investment requirement for the basic gaming loop.

      Over the course of the day there will be small unavoidable breaks, 5-15 minutes long during which there isn’t much to do. Cant really boot up a PC for more serious gaming session with such a small time even if I’m near a PC at that time, usually not.

      But there’s always a smartphone within reach. So this sort of random town building games are perfect to kill few minutes, pretty much same as killing some time doomscrolling or watching some YT videos.

    • Stefan_S_from_H@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      I wanted to test it, but my computer at the time had a small C drive, and Roblox couldn’t install on other drives.

      Later I learned that I’m probably far too old for it.

  • Kraiden@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    Dark Souls/Souls likes in generals. If I want to bang my head against the same problem endlessly and get hopelessly frustrated, I’d just do my day job

    • LostCarcosan@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Well… You’re not supposed to do that in those games though, so that could be why you don’t enjoy them

    • iegod@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      When I discovered Tunic is secretly soulslike I died a little. Never picked it back up.

        • chortle_tortle@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          In the settings they have a no fail mode. I was reluctant at first, but the game is so incredible and such a great puzzle game it was still amazing just larping that damage mattered while playing for the story.

      • boaratio@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I was so excited for Tunic, and then when I finally played it, it was such a letdown. The art and music are amazing, but it’s so cryptic and difficult.

  • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 month ago

    Sports games based on real teams. It makes me feel like I’m playing an ad. Oh yeah and if there are actual ads too. 😪

    Give me fake teams, fake players, even fake cities? and you have activated my interest.

  • Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Extraction shooters. You work your ass off to get gear, only to lose it to some griefing asshole hiding in a dark corner. Assuming you actually don’t lose your gear to players, server wipes are almost mandatory to keep people playing and to try and level the playing field. They’re like a worse battle royal.

    • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      What about single player ones? Zero sievert and escape from duckov.

      Bonus is that they have difficulty options to choose if you want to lose your stuff on death or not. Downside is that I think balancing a game around both of those being options is difficult and feels a bit off.

      Would be interested in a coop one tbh, ZS2 apparently doing coop.

    • 64bithero@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      People who like abusive relationships like this kind of stuff. Life is bad enough in the real world for me

    • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      Meta progression is what ruins these games imo. Back in my day (😮) we just played for points and knew they were worthless. And everything but your own skills reset after every match. And cosmetics were free because players just enjoy making them for eachother.

      But there’s not much to sell there, so no money being spent to trick you into getting addicted

  • vividspecter@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 month ago

    This is a hard one as I generally just ignore games that don’t appeal to me, so I forget they even exist.

    But I guess games that have FOMO mechanics that don’t respect your time and push you towards playing every day.

    • 64bithero@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      Likewise I am a point in my life where I can see one gameplay video and be like yep not for me. But I sometimes question how it could be for anyone

  • ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    WoW.

    It was a boring grindfest when it came out. Why are people still playing this outdated, frankly boring, game 22(?) years later?