• 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Then organise the renters, let them buy the house to transform it into syndicate or cooperative housing. Social apartment construction isn’t impossible.

        • orrk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          ask yourself this: if the apartment is owned by a company who is in charge of bills?

          in the case witht he syndicate, the syndicate is in charge of the bills, the bills are split up among the members, this stuff all already exists btw.

  • Dojan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    You can still have trees and plant life in low density housing. You don’t need green deserts everywhere.

        • activ8r@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          We used to be a great nation… Invading… Murdering… Stealing… Imposing grass deserts… Now we have left the EU, are implementing government spyware and have no plans to make anything better…

          I don’t remember what my point was, but England is shit and I don’t want to be here anymore.

      • Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.worldOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yup, tons more parking and tons more road space per capita as well. Low-density sprawl just needs a lot more stuff per capita.

      • Dojan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t really care. As a lifelong apartment dweller; I hate people and want nothing to do with them. Get me a house far away from civilisation and I’ll be happy. Communal space, my arsehole.

        • rexxit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          This is the insanity of people who advocate for densified housing, IMO. I loathe apartments and attached dwellings. It’s like a dystopian future where you can’t own anything or have private space. If I never have to share a wall or floor with someone again, it will be too soon.

          • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s like a dystopian future where you can’t own anything or have private space.

            That’s our dystopian, low-density present.

            • rexxit@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’ve lived in 4 major cities including NYC, and several small cities. The small cities and green suburbs are light years better than the dense urban hellscapes, without exception. Apartment living is also universally awful. There’s nothing desirable to me about what you idealize.

              • rambaroo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Don’t bother. The regulars on this sub are totally out of touch with reality and normal people.

                • rexxit@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I guess if I really wanted to scream at a wall, I’d make a c/fuck-fuckcars. These people are beyond help, but I hope they grow out of it so I don’t have to live in high density hell because infinite growth is just accepted as normal.

  • biofaust@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Do you dare come say this here in Scandinavia please? FYI, you will suffer the date of Vigo the Carpathian, but I promis to erect a nice slab of stone for you.

  • rah@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Why not prefer apartments in your own town?

    Noise. Neighbours being closer.

    • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This isn’t a particularly convincing analogy. Islands have limited space. The suburbs where I live border tons of open space and parks. Meanwhile, our school district is already overwhelmed with children, so converting commercial spaces into apartments will merely add to congestion and sprawl. NIMBY’s make a convincing argument against denser residential construction.

      A better focus would be the ability to simplify public transit and walkability. Town centers and public spaces could be more accessible with denser residential construction, and the additional green space can be closer to where you live without everyone needing their own half-acre yard to mow and water.

      • GBU_28@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’d take it over the sound of the upstairs neighbor fucking his microwave while bowling at the same time

      • Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.worldOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I live in an apartment with actual good sound-proofing. It’s almost dead silent inside except for the quiet hum of my AC. It’s legitimately so much quieter than my gf’s family’s house, where you constantly hear the rush of cars driving by on the street. Not to mention leafblowers and lawnmowers.

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          You realize you are speaking from a very lucky position right? Everyone here agrees quiet apartments with clean facilities are pretty nice, but a large majority of apartment dwellers live in older, very noisy, very poorly managed facilities.

          It’s very fair to want the conversation on improving apartments, it is super important. But you.have to acknowledge that people’s response about their apartment history is informed from lived experience.

          • biddy@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s not luck. Things are built for a reason, the regulations and structures of society are designed, and it artificially dictate s what is built. Perhaps they live in a place where the regulations mean that sensible livable apartments are fairly abundant. Perhaps you don’t. That’s not luck, those places were designed that way.

            • GBU_28@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The homie was pooped out in a place where it was possible, and that was luck.

          • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think the phrase “lived experience” should automatically disqualify someone from speaking about any topic. They’re just anecdotes, usually in contradiction to actual data.

            • GBU_28@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Ok?

              So for example the “lived experience” of black folks in the southern US in the 60s isn’t valuable I’m the discussion of racism in America? Of course it is. Their first hand experience (indeed anecdotal as you say) is meaningful.

              In the context of apartments, especially in America, millions of units are no where near the soundproofing or quality OP was describing. You could determine that by age of the buildings alone.

              Do you have sound dampening data for apartments across the country?

              Anecdotes are only problematic when they are purported as data. By definition someone relaying their lives experience suggests they are describing their individual life to you. It’s fine to want to move from anecdote to data, but when you talk about “disqualification” from discussion you’re just being a gatekeeper. There is no data rigor here, this is a message board about a meme.

              Lastly the person I responded to described THEIR lived experience (the quiet apartment they have) so that further insulates myself and others from any objective requirements to comment.

              • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                So for example the “lived experience” of black folks in the southern US in the 60s isn’t valuable I’m the discussion of racism in America?

                When their “lived experience” is “no, I’ve never seen any racism!” then no, it’s not really valuable, and it’s incredibly suspect to boot.

                It’s fine to want to move from anecdote to data

                Let’s just start with data. Anecdotes are supplementary. The way “lived experience” is usually used (and is used here) is to provide the primary support to an argument.

                • GBU_28@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Again you’re expecting a rigor beyond the venue of discussion, especially given that the person I replied to started with an anecdote as well.

                  If you have data on the soundproofedness of apartments across the US to contextualize the common consensus to the level you expect I would be happy to browse it.

                  Until then I’m comfortable believing anyone (as in the many commenters here) who say their apartment was loud. The several I lived in were as well so I have no reason to question it

    • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ownership. You will not own your apartment, it will be owned by your landlord and you will pay him whatever he demands. You will not own the forest, either. The state will, or some private entity will. No trespassing.

      • J4g2F@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        You can still own and buy appartements in most places in the world. Then there are many forms of social housing.

        Rent to own is also a possibility but not seen in most countries.

        Seems your problem is not ownership but landlords.

        Some countries in Europe have the right to roam on any land. State owned and private owned. (Maybe more countries somewhere else have it to but I don’t know)

        It does not need to be so terrible. In some places it just is because of profits

        • neatchee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Owning an apartment and owning land are wildly different. The housing structure alone is not the entirety of home ownership.

          • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Since we’re just talking hypotheticals anyway, let’s say in the second image the land is actually owned by the owners of the apartments, like a co-op.

            • neatchee@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s still not ownership. That’s co-ownership. I’m not free to do what I want with it, when I want.

              Same reason I hate HOAs

                • jj4211@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Whatever reasonable thing you want will tend to fly though. Versus HOA which often dictate crazy restrictions.

  • AKADAP@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I spent seven years living in an apartment. I so enjoyed hearing the neighbors having sex, the thumping music they played, the smell of their cigarette smoke inside my apartment with all my windows closed, the random intrusions by management to repair something unrelated to my apartment, the random rent increases. Add this to the fact that I had no space for a work shop to make anything, and paying the equivalent of a mortgage with no equivalent home equity. Some people love apartment life, but it definitely was not for me.

    • notatoad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      the problem seems to be when people take “apartment life isn’t for me” and then go to the conclusion of “they shouldn’t build apartments for anybody”

      you don’t have to live in one. just let people build them. only allowing single family homes doesn’t make single family homes more accessible for anybody, it just makes land more scarce and housing less affordable all around.

      • kier@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Of course. Everyone can live in an apartment if they wish. I will be the one with the house at a reasonable distance.

  • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    You know how computers were supposed to make life so easy we’d only have to work a few hours a week, and how that never happened.

    This is the same thing.

    • jerkface@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      The per capita GDP massively increased. Are you saying your wages did not keep pace??

  • HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    A lot of people are pro-apartmemt before living in one, so here are some fun facts:

    1. Apartments usually have a maintenance cost, that covers as little as possible while still costing a lot. You never really own the flat, the building company does.

    2. You often have a communal garden; it’s looked after by the lowest bidding contractor. Not all flats have balconies, so you are unlikely to have your own.

    3. Fear of fire and flooding - if someone else messes up, your stuff is toast/soaked. Insurance companies love that extra risk, it gives them an excuse to charge more.

    4. No flat has good sound proofing - the baby screaming downstairs at 5am and the thunder of the morbidly obese person upstairs going to the bathroom at 1am will denote your new sleep schedule (i.e. disturbed)

    5. I hope you’re in for deliveries - apartments have no safe spots to leave things.

    6. You will not be able to afford a flat with the same floor space as a house. I’m sorry, welcome to your new coffin.

    7. Good luck drying your laundry (spoiler, your living room is going to have a laundry rack).

    8. Good luck owning a bike (it’s either the bike or your laundry, take your pick).

    9. Vocal intimacy becomes a community event.

    Living in a flat is a pile of little miseries grouped together.

    • rexxit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Exactly. People who advocate for densification are basically advocating for everywhere to be Amsterdam or NYC with continuous human habitation and maybe small concessions in the form of city parks (a joke compared to real natural areas, IMO).

      I’m not sure if they’re aware that this will be the logical conclusion of those policies.

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’d rather have a few cities and a lot of unspoilt nature than no cities and no nature, just suburban sprawl everywhere

        • rexxit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          How about nice green suburbs with single family homes and a lot fewer people?

      • kier@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Nah mate, there should be laws to how much people can live in some area. It’s inhumane to compress so many people in one place. I don’t want every city to be Hong Kong.