• InfiniteHench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I’m a huge train and transit advocate and I try to take Amtrak every chance I get. But “tickets are cheaper” does not feel like a blanket statement we can make. Maybe on very specific, usually short legs, like Chicago to Milwaukee. Someone correct me if I’m wrong or there’s more nuance but once a trip goes past 3 or 5+ hour mark, the price seems to skyrocket past airfare.

  • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The cost of dedicated passenger rail lines is staggering, and the US has a LOT of ground to cover.

    • Fleur_@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      55 minutes ago

      Yeah no country has ever built a high speed passenger rail network interconnecting cities spread throughout an area comparable to the usa. And it’s absurd to think that it could be done in under 20 years and receive massive popular support and have universally recognised benefits. Guys the cost is too high for the biggest economy on earth and the distance is so far that they could never build a railway across it especially not more than 100 years ago.

      (Well to be fair the Chinese did also build the railways across the US so maybe they do have something America doesn’t)

    • Chakravanti@monero.town
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Well, technically, you’re not because no one is. America is dead. Some corporate fraudster (redundant to say that, I know), tricked zuckers into fucking anything at all didn’t matter, broke the machines with the cracker, generated his fraud of success (like every corporation, ever), then threw away half the votes so that those idiots discoverrs could fight with those calling out the cracker instead of realizing that they agree that:

      That “person” is NOT the president. Never was, but that’s a whole other corporate sham. When no one stopped them, they’re dismanted the whole gorram gov and Auctioned it out after smuggling anything that mattered to the other place doing the same damn shit pretending we’re any fucking different from his trick.

  • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Is there any parody porn about TSA? I want to masturbate to it. As long as it’s not too noncon (like TSA in real life), I don’t really care about the details (I’m ok with any gender, large insertions/fisting, etc.).

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Honestly I think it’s just sticker shock. I would say that as soon as we get some people would be more willing to get more, but no, because people are hesitant to expand existing rail. MARTA please expand, I beg you. Oh great spirits of public transit, I pray that you soften the NIMBYs’ hearts.

    It’s so upsetting that every small town in my state has an old historic train stop but none of them are actually passenger train stops anymore. Once you see it you can’t unsee it. I am 15 minutes from my town’s historic train stop which is a steak house now. My parents are about the same distance from theirs, probably even closer, but it’s a museum or something. Can I just take a walk to the train, ride down, and see them? Nope. Gotta deal with the hellscape that is metro Atlanta traffic.

  • TheSlad@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Americans can’t do trains because it requires public infrastructure (rails), which apparently we are allergic to.

    • kieron115@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I’ve read articles in the past about high speed trains and/or just new train lines in general would get held up by little towns who didn’t want to lose the commuter traffic since it was the only thing keeping them afloat. There are too many towns that exist literally just to serve motorists and now nobody wants to get rid of them.

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Anybody who is making money off existing transportation is going to be against public transportation. Cab companies lobby against rail everywhere, from city to burbs or airport to downtown. Trucking, for obvious reasons. Passenger rail can carry cargo at night. And of course anybody selling fuel to the mass of cars, the petro industry.

      • dmention7@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        13 hours ago

        That is so odd… I’ve only ridden Amtrak a few times, but I was amazed at how many stops were just some small town that happened to lie on the rail line.

        Most small towns that lie on a major highway and are supported by commuter traffic are only going to support a truck stop and a few fast food restaurants at best. Sure, a true high speed rail line would likely only stop in larger metropolitan areas, so those meager income sources may dwindle. But on the other hand if I were a rail commuter in one of those rural/suburban areas, I’d be much more likely to spend some time doing a bit of shopping or lingering in a restaurant during that transition from the train to my car after work, than if I were just passing through in my car.

      • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        15 hours ago

        They are just very short sighted. Just lobby to have a station and a have commuter stops and people will flock to those “cheaper” areas to live bringing in tons of tax revenue and boosting the local economy.

        • Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          These small towns would still be an hour+ away from large cities, even with European speed high speed rail.

          Like for me, the nearest “big town” is about 100 miles from me, which is about a 2hr drive. And, at least from some quick googling, it looks like most commuter rail in France tops out at about 100mph. A train would not bring in more people haha

          • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Yeah, while I’m a huge advocate for an American Shinkansen, there’s really 4 zones of America for train speeds. East of the Appalachians its fast and easy and rail already works easy. West of them but east of the Mississippi, you’re gonna need high speed rail, but it’ll be somewhat similar to Europe. Between the Mississippi and the west coast, you’re gonna need high speed rail and quite a bit of patience. And on the west coast, you’ll hit up small cities, but honestly it’d be a great second high speed line after the New York-Chicago

          • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 hours ago

            You’d be suprised how many people commute more than an hour by car. The prospect of having affordable housing with more job opportunities will certainly bring in more people.

            • Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 hours ago

              France spends ~$15 million/mile for high speed commuter rail. Which means that line would cost $1.5 billion.

              I don’t think it’s bringing in that many more people. Even when you amortize it across all of the little cities it would go through

              • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                11 hours ago

                Implying the line would stop at the town and not carry on to the next. Also, how much is being spent on building and maintaining freeways?

                • jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  7 hours ago

                  too much, which is why I propose dirt highways with 45mph speed limits. Low initial cost, drivers drive safer, and helps the towing industry grow.

                • Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  11 hours ago

                  Even when you amortize it across all of the little cities

                  Please read the comment in it’s entirety before responding ❤️

    • nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      it requires cooperation with the project across all of these counties that the railway runs through. and they’re all corrupt or subject to democracy or whatever

  • Soapbox@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Americans can’t do high speed rail because we have aircraft, automobile, and petroleum industries who don’t want us to.

  • Yerbouti@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    Meanwhile, right wing parties in Quebec are fighting against a tramway project in Quebec city, that the entire country agreed to pay for, for which we have already invested half a billion, build stations, etc. They call it “War on cars”.

    • Wanderer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Honest fuck this.

      So you love driving and more people on the road will get off the road and take the train. It means you can drive even more! Why wouldn’t you want that.

      • outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Because the joy of driving isnt getting there fast or the union of man and machine or anything like that.

        It’s fucking up other people’s shit.

      • shads@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Because they don’t give a shit about driving? They care a lot more about their family members that own car dealerships, or are involved with the petrochemical industry.

        Or they saw that American rightwing grifters talk like this so they are cargo culting the fuck out?

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      The US has been fighting for years to put a high speed rail in between DC and New York. Every right-wing neighborhood in between is throwing signs out stop the maglev.

  • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Why would Americans care about trains when they’re gonna be a billionaire any day now and have their own private jet?

    /s

  • slingstone@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Doesn’t Europe have an extensive passenger train network?

    Also, I recently rode on Amtrak for a long trip from Columbia, SC to Baltimore, MD. This was my first time on any kind of train other than a subway or metro line. It had its drawbacks (incredibly long travel time and delays), but I always felt safe, and I had a lot more room than I would have had on any flight. The major drawbacks where the seats were somewhat uncomfortable and things like that are largely due to the fact that the cars were pretty old, and not inherent to train travel if it was properly maintained. The cost was much less, and the free parking was such a great bonus.

    • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Also, I recently rode on Amtrak for a long trip from Columbia, SC to Baltimore, MD. This was my first time on any kind of train other than a subway or metro line. It had its drawbacks (incredibly long travel time and delays)

      I thought about taking an Amtrak to Boston for a trip since it was a vacation and I wasn’t in a huge rush travel wise. By “incredibly long travel time” in my case it would have gone from ~3 hours (two roughly one hour flights with a very short layover you’ve got to haul ass through because for some reason the relevant gates are both at the far ends of different concourses at Dulles) to about a day. Wasn’t in a rush, but that’s a bit too far to the other extreme.

    • Kjell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Europe has an extensive passenger train network, but most of it is not high speed rail.

      I looked on travelling from Madrid to Paris and it takes 2 hours if you fly (and then some time before for travelling from the city center to the airport, luggage check-in etc.), 11 hours with train and 13.5 hours with car. I think there are high speed rails between Madrid and Barcelona and in France, but still it takes that long time. The cost is similar.

      Trains are really good but they have limitations, each type of travel has its advantages.

      When I checked how long distance it was between Columbia, SC and Baltimore, MD I realised it was much shorter than Madrid - Paris. So I checked Munich - Paris instead which is only a 10 km longer than Columbus - Baltimore. It takes 7 hours with train and 8.5 - 9 hours with car. The flight takes 1 hour 35 minutes but the estimated time for travelling from central Munich to the airport, transfer time, flight, transfer and travel to central Paris is 5 hours.

      • slingstone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        With delays, my actual time was around 11 hours. The last leg, from Washington, DC to Baltimore was actually on high speed commuter rail, and that was phenomenal. The cars were newer and the speed was far greater. I imagine if most traffic in the northeast US is like that, it’s actually pretty good.

        Thanks for the European info. It’s interesting to know we have similar challenges. I would think, though, that high speed rail would be easier to implement in Europe since you don’t seem to have as many people stuck on automobile culture as we do in North America. However, I could see politics being an issue, wherever you go for various reasons.

    • Pan0wski@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Doesn’t Europe have an extensive passenger train network?

      Yes and no. It depends on which part of Europe you are in.

      • slingstone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        15 hours ago

        It’s a bit like that in the States, with a lot of the infrastructure appearing to be concentrated in the Northeast.

          • jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 hours ago

            and that’s the one legitimately good reason to oppose it. The city folk act like they are the only places in the world and completely ignore the rest of the country, the worlds largest ball of yarn wouldn’t exist without small towns, neither would wal-mikes.

    • Maalus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      It does, though there are some issues with track sizes that are being solved here and there every 10 years. Depends on what someone means by “high speed rail” though, since most people think “maglev” as if it isn’t almost the same bullcrap as hyperloop in terms of viability.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    119
    ·
    24 hours ago

    Yeah why doesn’t Europe have trains?

    Europe definitely doesn’t have trains already.

    • whyNotSquirrel@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      75
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Still too much plane for local journeys

      And is France train are not cheaper than planes or buses… Which is stupid, they should start to properly taxe Airlines

      • Tenkard@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        23 hours ago

        They’re building high speed rails connecting major European cities as we speak, we’ll be good

      • Opisek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Do you happen to use Dvorak?

        Sorry for the random question out of this air, but the in/is typo is something that happens a lot to me while being nearly impossible on “standard” keyboard layouts.

    • fibojoly@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      21 hours ago

      We do. Not as much as we used to because privatisation is a plague upon mankind, also we have very diverse geography which makes developing new lines prohibitively expensive, even more so when you’re a private company. Add to that a lack of political backing and yeah, it’s all rather turgid, even if there are some extremely recent talks concerning transeuropean night trains and such.

      Those are going to be for our nice flat and speedy routes no doubt, but hey, it’s an effort in the right direction.

      But yeah, things are not gonna get better fast as long as we are cursed with privatisation. What a shit show to see our glorious TGV reduced to a shell of its former self.

      Meanwhile I just got an article yesterday that Wuhan is now connected to the super high speed network and the first 450kph train now connects it to Shanghai. Last time I was there the train was already TGV levels of speed and much more modern, and only a year later they are leaving us on the fucking dust…

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        18 hours ago

        China sees investment in mass transit as a loss leader. It costs more to put in than it generates in fairs, but the boost to connected economic zones pays back the cost several times over.

        The US sees investment in mass transit as a detriment to the airline, automotive, and fossil fuel industries. It would shrink the economy in three places where the nation has tried to goose growth for the last 60 years.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        18 hours ago

        If you’re on a long tube that travels quickly on the ground from one city to another, and everyone is talking in Spanish, you’re in a train.

        If you’re in a long tube that travels quickly on the air from one city to another, and everyone is talking English, you’re on a plane

    • PlexSheep@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      22 hours ago

      My total journey from Berlin home this week was about 50 minutes late, and the connection after the ICE was not pretty.

        • Barbarian@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          22 hours ago

          In Romania, CFR makes DB look like the most competent shining lights of progress by comparison.

          Track that hasn’t been properly maintained since the fall of communism (and we keep lowering max speeds because of it). Rolling stock consisting of hand-me-downs. Constant engine breakdowns.

          And the worst part? Due to political shenanigans finding inventive new ways to siphon money out of the company, it’s still managed to find a way to go bankrupt again, meaning another government bailout.

        • PlexSheep@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Yes, not just DB too, but the local transit agencies too. Its a wonder that it all works so well DESPITE decades of mismanagement and austerity.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Apparently Germany’s problem is that they run all the high-speed trains on the normal lines which means all of the normal trains have to work around them. Obviously you can’t have a normal train in front of a high-speed train so if the high-speed train is delayed by even a small amount it has a knock-on effect where a bunch of local service trains have to sit around waiting for the line to clear.

        Everyone else runs high-speed rail on their own tracks. So everyone gets to do what they want and not affect anybody else.

        The French do it better than the Germans, which is just not an acceptable state of affairs.

      • arrow74@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        50 minutes isn’t that bad tbh. I dont remember the last time I flew that there wasn’t a delay. Hell even the whole arriving 2 hours before ,finding parking, going through security is all so much more of a hassle.

        I’d much rather walk 5 minutes to the local subway head to the hauptbahnhof and wait 50 extra minutes for my train. I can at least go get a reasonably priced coffee while I wait.

  • VeryFrugal@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    I live in South Korea and HSRs are pretty much the only mode of (intercity) transportation that is relevant. Buses take too long, planes are expensive, while HSR(KTX)s are marginally cheaper than buses and take about ⅔ of a time.

    Of course, our country’s much much smaller than US/Canada so even the farthest lane takes only about 2.5 hours. It’s pretty cool.